Kallmerten v. Cowen
Citation | 111 F. 297 |
Decision Date | 26 October 1901 |
Docket Number | 892. |
Parties | KALLMERTEN v. COWEN et al. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
H. E. Bell, for plaintiff in error.
J. H. Collins, for defendants in error.
Before LURTON, DAY, and SEVERENS, Circuit Judges.
Conrad Kallmerten was killed at a point where one of the streets of Mansfield, Ohio, is crossed obliquely by a switching track of the railroad company. The court below, on the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence, instructed the jury to find for the defendant by reason of the contributory negligence of the deceased, and this is the only error relied upon. The judgment must be affirmed. The accident occurred in broad daylight. The deceased was familiar with the crossing. He was walking in the street, and could have seen the approaching cars for several hundred feet before he reached the crossing, if he had looked. The evidence was conclusive that he did not look before going on the track, and no legal excuse appears which would justify or excuse his want of attention to his surroundings.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Severtson v. Northern Pacific Railway Company, a Corporation
... ... approaching a railway track is held to a strict duty to ... ascertain if there are any trains coming, before going on the ... track. Kallmerten v. Cowen, 49 C. C. A. 346, 111 F ... 297; Korrady v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co. 131 Ind ... 261, 29 N.E. 1070; Young v. Old Colony R. Co. 156 ... ...
-
Curtis v. Louisville & N.R. Co.
...Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Tomlinson v. Railroad, 134 F. 233, 67 C.C.A. 218, and which we have applied in (e.g.) Kallmerten v. Cowen, 111 F. 297, 49 C.C.A. 346, Railroad v. Hurlburt, 221 F. 907, 137 C.C.A. 477. The judgment is affirmed. ...
-
Erie R. Co. v. Hurlburt
... ... N. P. Railroad v. Freeman, 174 U.S. 379, 19 ... Sup.Ct. 763, 43 L.Ed. 1014; I.C.R.R. Co. v ... Ackerman, 144 F. 959, 76 C.C.A. 13; Kallmerten v ... Cowen, 111 F. 297, 49 C.C.A. 346; Philadelphia & ... R.R. Co. v. Peebles, 67 F. 591, 14 C.C.A. 555 ... It is ... insisted by ... ...
-
McVicker v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
...N.E.2d 384; Moss v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 146 F.2d 673, 677-678, C.A.7, cert. denied, 325 U.S. 861, 65 S.Ct. 1200, 89 L.Ed. 1982; Kallmerten v. Cowen, 111 F. 297, C.A.6. In the Moss case, which involved Indiana law, the Court pointed out that the accident was caused because the plaintiff fai......