Kallmerten v. Cowen

Citation111 F. 297
Decision Date26 October 1901
Docket Number892.
PartiesKALLMERTEN v. COWEN et al.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)

H. E. Bell, for plaintiff in error.

J. H. Collins, for defendants in error.

Before LURTON, DAY, and SEVERENS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Conrad Kallmerten was killed at a point where one of the streets of Mansfield, Ohio, is crossed obliquely by a switching track of the railroad company. The court below, on the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence, instructed the jury to find for the defendant by reason of the contributory negligence of the deceased, and this is the only error relied upon. The judgment must be affirmed. The accident occurred in broad daylight. The deceased was familiar with the crossing. He was walking in the street, and could have seen the approaching cars for several hundred feet before he reached the crossing, if he had looked. The evidence was conclusive that he did not look before going on the track, and no legal excuse appears which would justify or excuse his want of attention to his surroundings.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Severtson v. Northern Pacific Railway Company, a Corporation
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1915
    ... ... approaching a railway track is held to a strict duty to ... ascertain if there are any trains coming, before going on the ... track. Kallmerten v. Cowen, 49 C. C. A. 346, 111 F ... 297; Korrady v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co. 131 Ind ... 261, 29 N.E. 1070; Young v. Old Colony R. Co. 156 ... ...
  • Curtis v. Louisville & N.R. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • May 2, 1916
    ...Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Tomlinson v. Railroad, 134 F. 233, 67 C.C.A. 218, and which we have applied in (e.g.) Kallmerten v. Cowen, 111 F. 297, 49 C.C.A. 346, Railroad v. Hurlburt, 221 F. 907, 137 C.C.A. 477. The judgment is affirmed. ...
  • Erie R. Co. v. Hurlburt
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • April 6, 1915
    ... ... N. P. Railroad v. Freeman, 174 U.S. 379, 19 ... Sup.Ct. 763, 43 L.Ed. 1014; I.C.R.R. Co. v ... Ackerman, 144 F. 959, 76 C.C.A. 13; Kallmerten v ... Cowen, 111 F. 297, 49 C.C.A. 346; Philadelphia & ... R.R. Co. v. Peebles, 67 F. 591, 14 C.C.A. 555 ... It is ... insisted by ... ...
  • McVicker v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • August 29, 1962
    ...N.E.2d 384; Moss v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 146 F.2d 673, 677-678, C.A.7, cert. denied, 325 U.S. 861, 65 S.Ct. 1200, 89 L.Ed. 1982; Kallmerten v. Cowen, 111 F. 297, C.A.6. In the Moss case, which involved Indiana law, the Court pointed out that the accident was caused because the plaintiff fai......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT