Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.
| Decision Date | 31 January 1985 |
| Citation | 98 N.J. 266,486 A.2d 334 |
| Parties | KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. WAKEFERN FOOD CORP., Third-Party Defendant. KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, George H. Friedman and Carol Moffatt, Defendants-Respondents. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 196 N.J.Super. 16, 481 A.2d 553 (1984).
Merritt T. Viscardi, Springfield, for plaintiff-appellant (Apruzzese & McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, Springfield, attorneys).
Gerald W. Conway, Roseland, for defendant-respondent third-party plaintiff Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc. (Conway & Reiseman, Roseland, and Shannon Z. Taylor, Secaucus, attorneys).
Robert M. Schwartz, Trenton, for defendants-respondents American Arbitration Association, George H. Friedman and Carol Moffatt (Amdur & Friedrich, Paramus, attorneys).
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 196 N.J.Super. 16, 481 A.2d 553 (1984).
For affirmance --Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN and GARIBALDI--6.
For reversal --None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Distajo
...Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 196 N.J.Super. 16, 481 A.2d 553 (1984), aff'd for reasons stated below, 98 N.J. 266, 486 A.2d 334 (1985). Contra Stevens/Leinweber/Sullens, Inc. v. Holm Dev. & Management, Inc., 165 Ariz. 25, 795 P.2d 1308, 1313 (Ct.App.1990); R.W. Roberts Const......
-
Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp.
...(App.Div.1986); Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 196 N.J.Super. 16, 21-22, 481 A.2d 553 (App.Div.1984), aff'd o.b., 98 N.J. 266, 486 A.2d 334 (1985). That view is reflected in the Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Laws § 187 (1969) (Restatement ), which provides that the law......
-
Apollo Technologies v. Centrosphere Indus.
...354 (D.N.J.1989) Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 196 N.J.Super. 16, 21-22, 481 A.2d 553 (App.Div. 1984), aff'd, 98 N.J. 266, 486 A.2d 334 (1985); Bell v. Merchants & Businessmen's Mut. Ins. Co., 241 N.J.Super. 557, 562, 575 A.2d 878 (App.Div.), cert. denied, 122 N.J. 395, 585 ......
-
Cheek v. United Healthcare
...Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 196 N.J.Super. 16, 481 A.2d 553 (1984),aff'd for reasons stated below, 98 N.J. 266, 486 A.2d 334 (1985)). Two cases particularly representing the national majority view, to which the majority opinion here devotes substantial attention in an effo......
-
ADR and the cost of compulsion.
...Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. 1 (1984); Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 481 A.2d 553 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984), aff'd, 486 A.2d 334 (N.J. (137.) See Drahozal, supra note 79, at 731-32. (138.) Johanna Harrington, Comment, To Litigate or Arbitrate? No Matter--The Credit Card......