Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.

Decision Date31 January 1985
CitationKalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 486 A.2d 334, 98 N.J. 266 (N.J. 1985)
PartiesKALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. WAKEFERN FOOD CORP., Third-Party Defendant. KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, George H. Friedman and Carol Moffatt, Defendants-Respondents.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 196 N.J.Super. 16, 481 A.2d 553 (1984).

Merritt T. Viscardi, Springfield, for plaintiff-appellant (Apruzzese & McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, Springfield, attorneys).

Gerald W. Conway, Roseland, for defendant-respondent third-party plaintiff Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc. (Conway & Reiseman, Roseland, and Shannon Z. Taylor, Secaucus, attorneys).

Robert M. Schwartz, Trenton, for defendants-respondents American Arbitration Association, George H. Friedman and Carol Moffatt (Amdur & Friedrich, Paramus, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 196 N.J.Super. 16, 481 A.2d 553 (1984).

For affirmance --Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
24 cases
  • Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Distajo
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • September 28, 1995
    ...Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 196 N.J.Super. 16, 481 A.2d 553 (1984), aff'd for reasons stated below, 98 N.J. 266, 486 A.2d 334 (1985). Contra Stevens/Leinweber/Sullens, Inc. v. Holm Dev. & Management, Inc., 165 Ariz. 25, 795 P.2d 1308, 1313 (Ct.App.1990); R.W. Roberts Const......
  • Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • October 19, 1992
    ...(App.Div.1986); Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 196 N.J.Super. 16, 21-22, 481 A.2d 553 (App.Div.1984), aff'd o.b., 98 N.J. 266, 486 A.2d 334 (1985). That view is reflected in the Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Laws § 187 (1969) (Restatement ), which provides that the law......
  • Apollo Technologies v. Centrosphere Indus.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • September 25, 1992
    ...354 (D.N.J.1989) Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 196 N.J.Super. 16, 21-22, 481 A.2d 553 (App.Div. 1984), aff'd, 98 N.J. 266, 486 A.2d 334 (1985); Bell v. Merchants & Businessmen's Mut. Ins. Co., 241 N.J.Super. 557, 562, 575 A.2d 878 (App.Div.), cert. denied, 122 N.J. 395, 585 ......
  • Cheek v. United Healthcare
    • United States
    • Maryland Supreme Court
    • November 13, 2003
    ...Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 196 N.J.Super. 16, 481 A.2d 553 (1984),aff'd for reasons stated below, 98 N.J. 266, 486 A.2d 334 (1985)). Two cases particularly representing the national majority view, to which the majority opinion here devotes substantial attention in an effo......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • ADR and the cost of compulsion.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 57 No. 5, April 2005
    • April 1, 2005
    ...Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. 1 (1984); Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 481 A.2d 553 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984), aff'd, 486 A.2d 334 (N.J. (137.) See Drahozal, supra note 79, at 731-32. (138.) Johanna Harrington, Comment, To Litigate or Arbitrate? No Matter--The Credit Card......