Kaminsky v. Segura

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationKaminsky v. Segura, 26 AD3d 188, 810 N.Y.S.2d 25, 2006 NY Slip Op 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Decision Date07 February 2006
Docket Number7780.
PartiesEDWARD A. KAMINSKY et al., Appellants, v. SPENCER SEGURA, Respondent.

Judicial review of an arbitration award is limited, and an award will not be vacated "unless it is violative of a strong public policy, or is totally irrational, or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on [the arbitrator's] power" (Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 NY2d 299, 308 [1984]; see also Matter of United Fedn. of Teachers, Local 2, AFT, AFL-CIO v. Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 1 NY3d 72, 83 [2003]). Arbitrators need only receive evidence that is "pertinent and material," and such determination will only be set aside if it deprives a party of a fundamentally fair hearing (DeSilva v. First Union Sec., Inc., 249 F Supp 2d 286, 290 [SD NY 2003]). Petitioners failed to meet their burden of showing, with clear and convincing proof, that the arbitrators' refusal to hear the rebuttal expert witness constituted misconduct by preventing them from eliciting pertinent and material testimony in this hearing which consumed 24 days over a 15-month period (see Matter of S. Wiener Furniture Co. [Kingston City Schools Consol.], 90 AD2d 875 [1982]). Petitioners could have called this witness during their case in chief (Republic of Croatia v. Trustee of Marquess...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • In re Kohn
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 31, 2022
    ...( Matter of Stolthaven Perth Amboy, Inc. v. JLM Mktg., Inc., 47 A.D.3d 414, 415, 849 N.Y.S.2d 513 [2008] ; see Kaminsky v. Segura, 26 A.D.3d 188, 189, 810 N.Y.S.2d 25 [2006] ).At the arbitration hearing, petitioners submitted an April 2018 email from John Petroccione, who designed the pools......
  • Bank of New York v. Spadafora
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 7, 2012
    ...160, 161, 608 N.Y.S.2d 180; Kaminsky v. Segura, 4 Misc.3d 1019[A], 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50963[U], 2004 WL 1945007 [2004], affd. 26 A.D.3d 188, 810 N.Y.S.2d 25). “In reviewing a trial court's findings of fact following a nonjury trial, this Court's authority is as broad as that of the trial co......
  • In re Arbitration Between Kohn and Waverly Homes Dev.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 31, 2022
    ...of a fundamentally fair hearing" (Matter of Stolthaven Perth Amboy, Inc. v JLM Mktg., Inc., 47 A.D.3d 414, 415 [2008]; see Kaminsky v Segura, 26 A.D.3d 188, 189 [2006]). At arbitration hearing, petitioners submitted an April 2018 email from John Petroccione, who designed the pools, opining ......
  • HFZ Bryant Park Owner LLC v. S. BP Assocs., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 7, 2019
    ...material,' and such determination will only be set aside if it deprives a party of a fundamentally fair hearing." Kaminsky v. Segura, 26 A.D.3d 188, 189 (1st Dept. 2006) (citation omitted). Here, the Arbitrator's proffered reasons for the decision to limit testimony had a sound basis. The A......
  • Get Started for Free