Kano v. National Consumer Co-op. Bank

Decision Date18 April 1994
Docket NumberNo. 92-16754,92-16754
Citation22 F.3d 899
PartiesWayne H.T. KANO; Patricia Kano, Trustee and Phillip Kau, Trustee, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL CONSUMER COOPERATIVE BANK, et al.; Frank L. Torres, Defendants-Appellees, and Jack L. Ayers, Jr. and Elsie M. Ayers, Third-party-plaintiffs-Appellees, George R. Madden, Jr., Third-party-defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Riccio M. Tanaka, Honolulu, HI, for plaintiffs-appellants.

James N. Duca, Shelby Ann Floyd, Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing, Honolulu, HI, Frank Torres, pro se, for defendants-appellees.

Before: POOLE, WIGGINS, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opening brief filed on behalf of appellant violated Fed.R.App.P. 32(a) in that the lines were not double-spaced, but were spaced only one-and-one half spaces apart. Furthermore, the footnotes were of a typeface much smaller than that permitted by the rule, and contained approximately eight lines per inch as opposed to six lines per inch in a normal single-spaced format. We estimate that the opening brief was the equivalent of at least sixty-five pages in length, far exceeding the fifty-page limit.

Counsel for appellant took full responsibility for the form of the brief. However, it is apparent from the reply brief filed by counsel that he knows what the spacing requirements are, even though the footnotes in the reply brief also do not comply with Rule 32. Consequently, we impose sanctions against counsel for the appellant in the amount of $1,500. See Adriana Intern. Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406, 1417 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109, 111 S.Ct. 1019, 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991) (imposing sanctions for failure to comply with Fed.R.App.P. 32(a)); see also 28 U.S.C. 1927 (authorizing sanctions for failure to comply with rules governing form of briefs). The court acknowledges payment of the sanction.

To continue reading

Request your trial
54 cases
  • Vandeventer v. Wabash Nat. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Indiana
    • 30 Junio 1995
    ...of briefs. Under § 1927, the Seventh Circuit imposed a $1,000 penalty solely on counsel. Id. See also, Kano v. National Consumer Cooperative Bank, 22 F.3d 899, 900 (9th Cir.1994). While the Court ultimately struck the offending brief here, it required an inordinate expenditure of Court time......
  • Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Louis Dreyfus Commodities LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • 24 Junio 2016
    ...Court strongly discourages the Parties from footnoting their legal citations in any future submissions. See Kano v. Nat'l Consumer Co-op Bank, 22 F.3d 899, 899–900 (9th Cir.1994).3 The Court also strongly recommends that the PSA cite to valid, relevant, and binding authority. For example, t......
  • Alpert v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • 21 Marzo 2017
    ...The Court strongly discourages the Parties from footnoting their legal citations in any future submissions. See Kano v. Nat'l Consumer Co-op Bank, 22 F.3d 899–900 (9th Cir. 1994).2 The "California district courts have generally held that the filed rate doctrine is not a per se bar" to kickb......
  • Tittel v. Browns Valley Irr. Dist.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 25 Marzo 1996
    ...We therefore impose sanctions upon him as follows: He shall, forthwith, pay the sum of $500 to Appellees. See Kano v. National Consumer Coop. Bank, 22 F.3d 899, 900 (9th Cir.1994); Adriana Int'l Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406, 1417 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109, 111 S.Ct. 101......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT