Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Leslie, 244

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
Writing for the CourtWOOD, J.
Citation167 S.W. 83,112 Ark. 305
PartiesKANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. LESLIE, ADMINISTRATOR
Docket Number244
Decision Date06 April 1914

167 S.W. 83

112 Ark. 305

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.

LESLIE, ADMINISTRATOR

No. 244

Supreme Court of Arkansas

April 6, 1914


[167 S.W. 84] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [167 S.W. 85] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [167 S.W. 86]

Appeal from Little River Circuit Court; Jefferson T. Cowling, Judge; affirmed.

STATEMENT BY THE COURT.

This is a suit brought by the appellee as administrator of the estate of Leslie A. Old, deceased, for the benefit of the widow and her infant child, under the Federal Employers' Liability Act and its amendment of April 5, 1910. The suit is brought for the loss of contributions to the widow and child by reason of the death of Old, and also for the conscious pain and suffering which Old endured before his death, which, under the act, survived to the administrator for the benefit of his widow and child.

The complaint, after alleging the incorporation of the appellant, and that it was engaged in interstate commerce, and after alleging that Leslie A. Old was in the employment of appellant as swing brakeman, actually engaged at the time of his injuries as such brakeman on a train that was being operated at the time in interstate commerce, alleged "that his work required him to look after and pass over the tops of the cars composing the middle section of said train; that there were two box cars or refrigerator cars of equal height, and that immediately in front of these two cars was an oil tank car; that the floor of this car was seven or eight feet lower than the runway on top of the refrigerator car immediately in its rear; that there were no ladders or grab-irons or hand-holds on the end of the box or refrigerator car to enable the brakeman to safely get from the top of the box or refrigerator car onto the platform or runway on the oil car immediately in front of it, except a ladder or grab-iron down the side of the refrigerator car some distance from the end thereof, that the absence of these grab-irons or hand-holds or ladders down the end of the box or refrigerator car made it unnecessarily hazardous for the brakeman to pass from the top of the box or refrigerator car to the platform or walkway of the oil tank car immediately in front of it; that there were no grab-irons or hand-holds on the end of the oil car or tank car immediately in front of the refrigerator car or any other appliances thereon to enable a brakeman in passing from the rear car to the oil car to hold to and steady himself while making the passage."

The complaint further alleged "that the engineer of said train was negligent on the occasion of deceased's injury in permitting his air to become out of order or in carelessly manipulating his air in such manner that said train was caused to jerk violently and unusually, which jerking contributed to the injury of plaintiff's deceased as aforesaid."

There were further allegations in the complaint to the effect that the defendant was negligent in making up said train "in carelessly and negligently placing the oil car or tank next to the box or refrigerator car knowing the platform or walkway on the oil car was some six or seven feet lower than the top of the box or refrigerator car, without providing some means or appliances on both the refrigerator car and the oil car which would enable brakemen to get from one to the other without any unnecessary danger."

There is an allegation to the effect that the acts of negligence complained of were unknown to the deceased, and by reason of his inexperience as a brakeman, he was unable to, and did not, appreciate the dangers arising from said acts of negligence.

There was a further allegation to the effect that "by reason of the absence of such hand-holds or ladders on the end of said box car or other proper appliances which would have enabled deceased to safely go from the top of said box car to said oil car, concurring with the unusual and violent jerking of the train as it passed out of Page, deceased was unable to get from the top of the box car to the oil car, and while in the effort to do so, and while in the exercise of due care himself, he was thrown between the ends of the said cars, or fell between the ends of said cars." and received the injuries, which were specifically described.

The complaint concluded with a prayer for damages on account of pain and suffering in the sum of ten thousand dollars and for loss of contributions in the sum of fifteen thousand dollars, and for a judgment in the total sum of twenty-five thousand dollars.

The appellant in due time and form, filed a petition and bond for removal of the cause to the Federal court, which was overruled. The appellant also moved to have the complaint made more definite and certain, which motion was overruled. Appellant then demurred, and its demurrer was overruled. Appellant then moved to strike out certain portions of the complaint, which motion was overruled. Appellant then answered, denying the allegations of the complaint and setting up the defense of contributory negligence. The appellant then filed a motion for a continuance, which was overruled. The appellant duly excepted to the rulings of the court on its motions and in overruling its demurrer.

The cause was then sent to the jury, and the testimony developed the following facts, as stated by counsel for appellee, which we find to be substantially correct.

On the forenoon of March 24, 1913, Leslie A. Old was sent out from De Queen, Arkansas, as middle brakeman on appellant's through freight train to Heavener, Oklahoma. Old was called for service on the train about an hour before it left De Queen. Appellant's road traverses a mountainous country, and there were some heavy grades from Mena north. Before descending these grades, it was necessary for the brakemen to go over the tops of the cars and turn up the retainer valves on from 75 to 80 per cent of the loaded cars, in order to assist the engineer down grade, and after the descent was made it was then necessary for the brakemen to again go over the tops of the cars and turn the retainer valves down. It was upgrade from Mena to Rich Mountain, and from Rich Mountain to Page, where the injury occurred, it was down grade. From Page two miles north it was up grade and then north down grade set in. The train arrived at Page at 8 o'clock at night and stopped there to get orders for future movements. Old and the head brakeman and the conductor all went in the station house at Page to secure their orders. They then left the station house to take up their duties on the train. The head brakeman came out first with orders for the engineer and proceeded to the front end of the train. Then the conductor came out and walked to the south end of the platform, about eighty feet from the station, and stopped. By this time the train had started slowly forward. Old passed the conductor, with his lantern, going south, and a very short time thereafter the conductor saw some man with a lantern climb up on the train about eighty feet south of him and from the point where he saw Old go. As the train moved slowly along a man with a lantern on top of the train, going north, passed the conductor. The car that the man was on was the second car in the rear of the tank car. As the train moved out there was a violent and unusual jerking of the cars, two jerks being especially noticeable. Just after the last heavy jerk some one was heard to cry out "Oh, Oh!" as if calling for help. After the train passed out a witness whose attention was attracted by the unusual jerking of the train went out on the track to discover what was the cause of the jerking, and ninety-five yards north of the front door of the station he found Leslie Old lying on the track between the rails with both legs cut off between the knees and the feet, one shoulder crushed and mangled, part of the left hand crushed off, and skin knocked off his head. Some fifteen or eighteen feet south of where he lay his lantern was found lying on the track between the rails, with the broken globe lying around it. About seven feet north of the lantern blood and small pieces of bone were found on the rail nearest the depot, and pieces of bone and blood were also found between this point and where the deceased lay. There were no signs of blood or bones anywhere else.

The two cars immediately in the rear of the tank car complained of were S. F.R.D. cars, of the same type and height. The tank car was a large iron tank set upon a frame in the nature of a flat car, and that part of the floor of this car between the tank and the outer edge was the only walkway or passageway over this tank car. The tank car had side rails on the outer edges of the side of the car which lacked twenty-four inches coming to the end of the frame of the car. The only appliance furnished the brakemen to pass from the top of the S. F.R.D. car to the tank car was a side ladder on the end thereof. One had to step from this side ladder onto the end of the tank car and grab to the end of the side rail on said car. From the side ladder to the nearest end of the side rail was about five feet. There was no end ladder on the S. F.R.D. car and no grab-irons on the end of that car except down near the bottom of the car, which was used by the brakemen in coupling and uncoupling cars. There were no end ladders or grab-irons on the tank car at all except on the sill below the floor. There was nothing on the end of the tank car for the brakemen to hold to while making the passage except the end of the side rail. It was necessary for a brakeman, in passing from the side ladder on the S. F.R.D. car to the tank car, while the train was in motion, to release his hold on the former before he was able to secure a hand-hold on the railing on the tank car.

It was shown that the train would have to go a quarter or a half mile after starting before it could get under good headway.

The appellant excepted to the rulings of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 practice notes
  • CSX TRANS., INC. v. Miller, No. 1142
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • October 1, 2004
    ...rules of evidence, —depend upon the law of the place where the suit is brought. (Emphasis supplied). See also Kansas C.S.R. Co. v. Leslie, 112 Ark. 305, 167 S.W. 83 (1914), rev'd on other grounds, 238 U.S. 599, 35 S.Ct. 844, 59 L.Ed. 1478; Delong v. Maine C.R. Co., 136 Me. 194, 6 A.2d 431 (......
  • St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company v. Craft, 38
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • December 7, 1914
    ...St. Louis & S. F. Rd. Co. v. Conarty, [115 Ark. 488] 106 Ark. 421, 155 S.W. 93, and in the case of Kansas City So. Ry. Co. v. Leslie, 167 S.W. 83, 112 Ark. 305. We adhere to the decisions there given for the reasons stated in those opinions, and it [171 S.W. 1186] would be useless to en......
  • Lusk v. Osborn, 124
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • January 29, 1917
    ...1. The first count is based entirely upon the Federal act and an action based upon that act can not be removed to the Federal Court. 112 Ark. 305; 238 U.S. 599. The fact that there were two counts, one based on the Federal act and the other on the "State statute," does not make th......
  • Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Leslie, 216
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • October 23, 1916
    ...in this court, it having heretofore been appealed from the judgment rendered against the railway company and affirmed by an opinion in 112 Ark. 305, where a sufficient statement of it appears. It was taken on a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States, where the judgment was ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
  • CSX TRANS., INC. v. Miller, No. 1142
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • October 1, 2004
    ...rules of evidence, —depend upon the law of the place where the suit is brought. (Emphasis supplied). See also Kansas C.S.R. Co. v. Leslie, 112 Ark. 305, 167 S.W. 83 (1914), rev'd on other grounds, 238 U.S. 599, 35 S.Ct. 844, 59 L.Ed. 1478; Delong v. Maine C.R. Co., 136 Me. 194, 6 A.2d 431 (......
  • St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company v. Craft, 38
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • December 7, 1914
    ...St. Louis & S. F. Rd. Co. v. Conarty, [115 Ark. 488] 106 Ark. 421, 155 S.W. 93, and in the case of Kansas City So. Ry. Co. v. Leslie, 167 S.W. 83, 112 Ark. 305. We adhere to the decisions there given for the reasons stated in those opinions, and it [171 S.W. 1186] would be useless to en......
  • Lusk v. Osborn, 124
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • January 29, 1917
    ...1. The first count is based entirely upon the Federal act and an action based upon that act can not be removed to the Federal Court. 112 Ark. 305; 238 U.S. 599. The fact that there were two counts, one based on the Federal act and the other on the "State statute," does not make th......
  • Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Leslie, 216
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • October 23, 1916
    ...in this court, it having heretofore been appealed from the judgment rendered against the railway company and affirmed by an opinion in 112 Ark. 305, where a sufficient statement of it appears. It was taken on a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States, where the judgment was ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT