Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Quin

Decision Date27 August 1936
Docket NumberNo. 7907.,7907.
Citation85 F.2d 485
PartiesKANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RY. CO. v. QUIN.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Edward S. Klein, C. Huffman Lewis, and W. Scott Wilkinson, all of Shreveport, La., for appellant.

S. P. Jones and Franklin Jones, both of Marshall, Tex., and Otis W. Bullock, of Shreveport, La., for appellee.

Before FOSTER, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellee brought this suit, for the benefit of herself and her two minor children, to recover damages for the death of her husband, O. B. Quin, who was killed in an accident while in the employ of appellant, an interstate railroad. The petition alleged actionable negligence under the provisions of the Federal Employers' Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq.) with an alternative claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act of Louisiana (Act La. No. 20 of 1914, as amended). Appellant defended on the ground that the facts did not bring the case within the federal law, denied negligence, pleaded contributory negligence and assumption of risk preventing recovery under the federal act, and pleaded limitation to the alternative claim under the Louisiana statute. The District Court ruled that the action came under the federal law and it was submitted to the jury on that theory. A verdict for $21,500 was returned on which judgment was entered. This appeal followed.

There are twenty-one assignments of error, but only a few of them require discussion. By motion to direct a verdict and by objections to parts of the charge, appellant raised the question that the deceased was not engaged in interstate commerce at the time of the accident. The following facts are undisputed:

Appellant is a railroad company engaged in both interstate and intrastate transportation. The deceased was employed as a brakeman on its local train designated as No. 37, running between Shreveport and Leesville, La.; its entire movement being within the state. When the train left Shreveport on the fatal trip, in addition to cars carrying intrastate freight there was included in the train a car of gravel shipped from Wilkins, Ark., to Many, La., and a car carrying merchandise for various way stations, referred to as a peddler car. At Many three bales of cotton consigned to Galveston, Tex., were loaded into the peddler car. At way stations three other cars consigned to points in Texas were added to the train. All the interstate freight was subsequently delivered at destination. The train reached Many between 1 and 1:30 p.m. October 17, 1932. The peddler car was spotted at the depot and after other switching operations, all by the train crew, with the engine used in hauling the train, a cut of seven empty box cars was pulled out of an adjacent house track for the purpose of adding two of them to the train. Five of these cars were then pushed back on the house track and one of them blocked a highway crossing. The deceased was signaled to by the conductor of the train, who was his superior to cut the crossing. He rode on the front end of an empty tank car, attached to the engine, to be coupled to the cars on the house track, for the purpose of opening the crossing. A flying switch was made with the engine following the empty tank car. When the engine caught up with the tank car, the impact...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Cooper v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 12, 1941
    ... ... Secs. 44-506, 44-544, General ... Statutes Kansas 1935; Schaefer v. Lowden, 147 Kan ... 520, 78 P.2d 48; Howard v ... Term. Railroad Assn., 336 Mo. 340, 78 ... S.W.2d 851; Southern Ry. Co. v. Jacobs, 81 S.E. 99; ... Coll v. Lehigh Valley Ry. Co., 130 ... 88; Sullivan v ... Wabash Ry. Co., 23 F.2d 323; Kansas City So. Ry. Co ... v. Quin, 85 F.2d 485. (b) The evidence clearly shows, as ... ...
  • Gray v. Kurn
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 6, 1940
    ... ... 506; Rowden v. Daniels, 151 ... Mo.App. 24; Burns v. Kansas City, St. S. & M. Ry ... Co., 129 Mo. 55; Hoffman v. Peerless White L ... 261, 59 L.Ed. 1298; Kansas City So ... Ry. Co. v. Quin, 85 F.2d 485; Penn. Co. v ... Donat, 239 U.S. 50, 60 L.Ed. 139; ... 648, 57 L.Ed. 1125, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 153; Kansas ... City Southern Ry. Co. v. Martin, 262 F. 241, 242; ... Sweany v. Wabash Ry. Co., 229 ... ...
  • Louisville & NR Co. v. Brittain
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 8, 1937
    ...v. Manning (C.C.A.) 62 F.2d 293; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Nash, 242 U.S. 619, 620, 37 S.Ct. 239, 61 L.Ed. 531; Kansas City So. R. Co. v. Quin (C.C.A.) 85 F.2d 485; Castonguay v. Grand Trunk R. Co., 91 Vt. 371, 100 A. 908; Boyer v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 162 Md. 328, 159 A. 909; Gasser v......
  • Wabash Ry. Co. v. Bridal, 10851.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • February 12, 1938
    ...253 U.S. 284, 40 S.Ct. 512, 64 L.Ed. 907; Pennsylvania Co. v. Donat, 239 U.S. 50, 36 S.Ct. 4, 60 L.Ed. 139; Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Quin, 5 Cir., 85 F.2d 485. There was, therefore, no error in denying defendant's motion for a directed verdict, nor was there any error in the instruct......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT