Kansas Natural Gas Co. v. Haskell
Decision Date | 03 July 1909 |
Docket Number | 856-859. |
Citation | 172 F. 545 |
Parties | KANSAS NATURAL GAS CO. v. HASKELL et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Oklahoma |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
E. L Scarritt, Eugene Mackey, John J. Jones, J. P. O'Meara Zevely, Givens & Smith, and Edward W. Hatch, for complainants.
Charles West, Atty. Gen., and Flynn, Ames & Chambers, for respondents.
The scope of each of the foregoing bills being identical, and the object and purpose sought to be accomplished thereby being the same, the cases will be considered together, as they have been argued, briefed, and submitted for decision in that manner. The facts necessary to a decision of the questions involved may be stated, as follows:
At its regular 1907 session the Legislature of this state passed an act, the same being chapter 67, p. 586, of the Laws for the Year 1907, which provides as follows:
The several bills presented in the above entitled and numbered cases call in question the constitutional validity of the foregoing enactment. The status and interest of the several complainan...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kansas City Gas Co. v. Kansas City
...229, 31 Sup.Ct. 564, 55 L.Ed. 716, 35 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1193, and the same principles are laid down by the Court of Appeals of this circuit in Haskell, Governor of Oklahoma, et al., v. (C.C.A.) 187 F. 403, 109 C.C.A. 235. The authorities in support of these principles are overwhelming in number......
-
Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission
...an act of the Legislature of Oklahoma prohibiting the transportation of natural gas in interstate commerce, held (Kansas Nat. Gas Co. v. Haskell C. C. 172 F. 545) that natural gas found within the territorial limits of a state was not a product which the state may conserve and preserve by l......
-
In re Skelton Lead & Zinc Co.
...R. Co., supra; Union P. R. Co. v. Peniston, supra; Central P. R. Co. v. California, supra; Thomas v. Gay, supra. Also, in Kansas Natural Gas Co. v. Haskell, 172 F. 545, on the question as to whether the lessees' share of the oil and gas after it had been extracted from the earth and separat......
-
In re Skelton Lead & Zinc Co.'s Gross Production Tax for 1919
... ... manufacturing establishments. They are the property of ... natural persons or of corporations, who are agents or ... instruments of the general government, and they ... R. Co. v. Cal., supra; Thomas v ... Gay, supra ... Also, ... in Kansas Natural Gas Co. v. Haskell (C. C.) 172 F ... 545, on the question as to whether the lessees' ... ...