Kansas-Nebraska Nat. Gas Co. v. Village of Deshler, Neb., Civ. No. 0376.
Court | United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. United States District Court of Nebraska |
Writing for the Court | DELEHANT |
Citation | 192 F. Supp. 303 |
Parties | KANSAS-NEBRASKA NATURAL GAS COMPANY, a Kansas Corporation, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF DESHLER, NEBRASKA, a Municipal Corporation, and E. C. Hornbostel, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Deshler, Nebraska, and William Posvar, Erwin Uphoff, Ed. F. Smith and John Malpert, members of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Deshler, Nebraska, and the Court of Condemnation, composed of Cloyde B. Ellis, Fay H. Pollock and Edmund Nuss, Defendants. |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 0376. |
Decision Date | 12 August 1960 |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
James D. Conway, Conway & Irons, and Elmer J. Jackson, Hastings, Neb., for plaintiff.
W. O. Baldwin, Hebron, Neb., Herman Ginsburg, Ginsburg, Rosenberg & Ginsburg, Lincoln, Neb., for defendants, except Court of Condemnation and its members.
It may be understood that, of the identified defendants, those named as, "the Court of Condemnation, composed of Cloyde B. Ellis, Fay H. Pollock and Edmund Nuss," have taken no active part in this proceeding, and filed no pleadings herein, in relation to the controversy upon which ruling is being announced. Thus far, the litigation has been conducted, as the nature of the case suggests, between the plaintiff on the one hand, and, on the other, the defendants, The Village of Deshler, Nebraska, a Municipal Corporation, and E. C. Hornbostel, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Deshler, Nebraska, and William Posvar, Erwin Uphoff, Ed. F. Smith and John Malport, members of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Deshler, Nebraska. It is, therefore, to those parties respectively that the court will refer herein by the employment of the several designations, "plaintiff" and "defendants," without further particularization respecting the "defendants."
Observed by the court, but accorded no practical consideration, are two irregularities in the names of certain defendants. Erwin Uphoff is declared in the Marshal's return to have been served with process under the name of Edwin Uphoff. Any irregularity thus disclosed is obviated by his joining in the answer as Erwin Uphoff. Then, another defendant member of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Deshler, Nebraska, is both designated in the complaint and served with process as Ed. F. Smith. But no such name is given by anyone joining in the signature of the answer. Rather, a person designated as S. F. Smith appears among the defendants in behalf of whom the answer is made, despite a recital in the opening paragraph of that pleading that Ed. F. Smith joins with others in tendering it. It may be assumed that the reference to S. F. Smith is mistaken. If counsel desire to pursue any steps in the way of clarification of the confusion, they may do so. On its part, the court does not even suggest that any such step is necessary.
Preliminary mention is also made that within the court's awareness, during the pendency of the case, the Honorable Cloyde B. Ellis, one of the members of the Court of Condemnation, has died. His death poses no problem in the present ruling. It is contemplated as a possibility, and provision is made for a substitution in his stead, by Section 19-703, R.S. Neb.1943.
Regard being had to the course of the pleading in, and to the manner of submission of, the case, it is considered to be appropriate that the pleadings be recalled at substantial length. That effort will allow a corresponding abbreviation, through the elimination of much repetition, in the statement of the facts.
By its complaint, the plaintiff makes the following allegations, which by the defendants' answer, are unequivocally admitted.1
In addition to those unequivocally and unreservedly admitted allegations, the plaintiff, in its complaint, makes other allegations, which in their answer, the defendants either deny categorically, or admit only partially or with express reservation. Again resorting to the numbering of paragraphs in the complaint, those further allegations are now summarized. And in the summary which immediately follows, the allegations of the several paragraphs of the complaint are first set out in the way either of summary or of reflection by copy; and, immediately after that reflection of the content of each paragraph of the complaint, the response to the allegations of such paragraph of the complaint, made by defendants in their answer is disclosed. This device is resorted to in an effort to bring into the closest practicable proximity the factual declarations of the several parties in respect of each point discussed in their pleadings.
IV. The Chairman and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deshler, Nebraska, on March 5, 1957, passed a resolution, providing for the submission of a purported "notice of condemnation" of the gas distribution system of plaintiff in the Village of Deshler, Nebraska, and certain other property, to the electors of the Village of Deshler, Nebraska, allegedly pursuant to the requirements of Section 19-701, R.S.Neb.1943, of which resolution a true copy is attached to, and incorporated into, the complaint. Thereafter, on March 13, 20 and 27, 1957, Notice of Election on the "adoption of the purported Notice of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kansas-Nebraska Nat. Gas Co. v. Village of Deshler, Neb., 16596.
...a different result than did the federal District Court. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. --------Notes: 1 Filed August 12, 1960, 192 F.Supp. 303. --------...
-
Brodine v. State, Dept. of Roads, 36249
...reason of which the identical property can be definitely located.' See also Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co. v. Village of Deshler, D.C., 192 F.Supp. 303, affirmed 8 Cir., 288 F.2d In Fremont, E. & M.V.R.R. Co. v. Mattheis, 39 Neb. 98, 57 N.W. 987, the description contained in the petition p......
-
Mian v. Paukstis, Civil Action No. PX 17-1971
...v. Glick, No. 1:15CV596, 2016 WL 6238542, at *3 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 2016); Kansas-Nebraska Nat. Gas Co. v. Vill. Of Deshler, Neb., 192 F. Supp. 303, 311 (D. Neb. 1960), aff'd sub nom. Kansas-Nebraska Nat. Gas Corp. v. Vill. Of Deshler, Neb., 288 F.2d 717 (8th Cir. 1961) (reply to answer was ......
-
Estes v. Burnside, 3:11CV00109-BRW
...more definite statement of affirmative defenses). 8.Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). 9.See Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co. v. Village of Deshler, 192 F. Supp. 303 (D.C. Neb. 1960), affirmed 288 F.2d 717. 10.See 5 CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 1185 (3d ed....