Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins, et al

Docket Number10-3002
Decision Date01 September 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1381 cases
  • Nally v. Graham
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • July 29, 2021
    ...1177 (10th Cir. 2007).2 Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009).3 Kan. Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins , 656 F.3d 1210, 1214 (10th Cir. 2011) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544, 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) ).4 Iqbal , 556 U.S......
  • Tafoya v. New Mexico
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • February 4, 2021
    ...not suffice; a plaintiff must offer specific factual allegations to support each claim.’ " MTD at 3 (quoting Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins, 656 F.3d 1210, 1214 (10th Cir. 2011) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955 )).The State Defendants argue that Tafoy......
  • Hoogerhuis v. Birnbaum
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • March 23, 2021
    ...in the amended complaint, including more information about his state law claims that he wishes to pursue. See Kan. Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins, 656 F.3d 1210, 1215 (10th Cir. 2011) (" ‘It is particularly important ... that the complaint make clear exactly who is alleged to have done what to......
  • Kan. Motorcycle Works USA, LLC v. McCloud
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • October 27, 2021
    ...L.Ed.2d 929 (2007).The Tenth Circuit has summarized two "working principles" that underlie this standard. Kan. Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins , 656 F.3d 1210, 1214 (10th Cir. 2011) ; see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678–79, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). First, the Court ign......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • IV. Other Constitutional Issues
    • United States
    • Sword and Shield: A Practical Approach to Section 1983 Litigation (ABA) Chapter 7 The Section 1983 Land Use Case
    • Invalid date
    ...729 (2001).[212] . Moore-King v. Cnty. of Chesterfield, 708 F.3d 560, 572 (4th Cir. 2013).[213] . Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins, 656 F.3d 1210, 1217-18 (10th Cir. 2011) (requiring a "'substantial burden' that plaintiffs demonstrate others 'similarly situated in all material respects'")......
  • Pleading an Antitrust Conspiracy in a Post-twombly World
    • United States
    • California Lawyers Association Competition: Antitrust, UCL and Privacy (CLA) No. 24-2, September 2015
    • Invalid date
    ...1288, 1298 (10th Cir. 2008).193. Robbins v. Okla., 519 F.3d 1242, 1249 (10th Cir. 2008); see also Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins, 656 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2011) (equal protection case).194. 626 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 2010).195. Id. at 1331.196. Id. at 1333.197. This is not to say that the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT