Kansas v. Marsh
| Decision Date | 31 May 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 04-1170.,04-1170. |
| Citation | 544 U.S. 1060 |
| Parties | KANSAS v. MARSH. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Sup. Ct. Kan. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following questions: "Does this Court have jurisdiction to review the judgment of the Kansas Supreme Court under 28 U. S. C. § 1257, as construed by Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U. S. 469 (1975)?"; "Was the Kansas Supreme Court's judgment adequately supported by a ground independent of federal law?" Reported below: 278 Kan. 520, 102 P. 3d 445.
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
Puckett v. Epps, Civil Action No. 2:04CV302HSO.
...in his reply brief, the United States Supreme Court had granted certiorari on this question in the case of Kansas v. Marsh, 544 U.S. 1060, 125 S.Ct. 2517, 161 L.Ed.2d 1109 (2005). After briefing on this case had concluded in this Court, the Supreme Court rendered its opinion, which is unfav......
-
Industrial Consumers Group v. Corp. Com'n, 96,228.
... . 138 P.3d 338 . KANSAS INDUSTRIAL CONSUMERS GROUP, INC., Raytheon Aircraft Company, Cessna Aircraft Company, Buzzi Unicem USA, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Coffeyville ...1, 14, 687 P.2d 603 (1984). It is not the court's function to rewrite otherwise clear statutes. State v. Marsh, 278 Kan. 520, 539, 102 P.3d 445 (2004), cert. granted 544 U.S. 1060, 125 S.Ct. 2517, 161 L.Ed.2d 1109 (2005); Natalini v. Little, 278 Kan. 140, ......
- Kansas v. Marsh
-
Reynolds v. State
......State, 411 So.2d 172 (Fla.1982). However, Reynolds urges this Court to adopt the logic of the Supreme Court of Kansas in State v. Marsh, 278 Kan. 520, 102 P.3d 445 (2004), cert. granted, 544 U.S. 1060, 125 S.Ct. 2517, 161 L.Ed.2d 1109 (2005), recede from our ......
Request a trial to view additional results