Karlock v. New York Cent. R. Co.
| Decision Date | 09 March 1948 |
| Docket Number | Gen. No. 10159. |
| Citation | 333 Ill.App. 655,78 N.E.2d 122 |
| Parties | KARLOCK v. NEW YORK CENT. R. CO. |
| Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Circuit Court, Kankakee County; C. D. Henry, Judge.
Proceeding by Rose Karlock, administrator of the estate of Frank Karlock, deceased, against New York Central Railroad Company, a corporation, for damages for the death of deceased from injuries sustained in a collision between truck belonging to deceased and one of defendant's trains. From an adverse judgment, defendant appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Eva L. Minor, of Kankakee, for appellant.
Donald D. Zeglis, of Momence, for appellee.
(Publish abstract only.)
To continue reading
Request your trial
16 cases
-
Baker v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.
...of law. The question of due care in this situation was a question for the jury. Hughes v. Wabash R. Co., supra, Karlock v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co., 333 Ill.App. 655, 78 N.E.2d 122. With respect to Dixie Baker's daughters, who were passengers, there was no evidence of careful habits, but there were c......
-
Weingart v. Weingart
...know which facts he knew firsthand. * * * Our decisions should not turn on such points. Mr. Justice Bristow in Karlock v. New York Cent. R. Co., 333 Ill.App. 655, 78 N.E.2d 122, quotes Mr. Justice Cardozo as "The law has outgrown its primitive state of formalism when the precise word was th......
-
Capitol Records, Inc. v. Vee Jay Records, Inc.
...'snare and a pitfall for the unwary member of the profession' Both cases relied upon Mr. Justice Bristow in Karlock v. New York Cent. R. Co., 333 Ill.App. 655, 78 N.E.2d 122 (1948) in which he quoted Mr. Justice 'The law has outgrown its primitive state of formalism when the precise word wa......
-
Smith v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
...to making the crossing safe for the public. Wagner v. Toledo P. & W. R. R., 352 Ill. 85, 185 N.E. 236, Karlock v. New York Central R. Co., 333 Ill.App. 655, 78 N.E.2d 122. We think there is no merit to the contention that the verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence. On the qu......
Request a trial to view additional results