Karwath, In re
| Decision Date | 05 July 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 55089,55089 |
| Citation | 199 N.W.2d 147 |
| Parties | In the Interest of Bryan KARWATH et al., Appellees. The STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Raymond KARWATH, Appellant. |
| Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Donald E. Doyle, Davenport, for appellant.
Bruce A. Shawver, Davenport, for children, appellees.
Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., Lorna L. Williams and Thomas R. Hronek, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., and Loren T. Hora, Davenport, for appellee.
In this appeal the natural father of three children in legal custody of the Scott County Department of Social Services seeks reversal of a juvenile court order for surgical removal of the children's tonsils and adenoids. We affirm.
Our review is de novo. § 232.58, The Code; In re Delaney, 185 N.W.2d 726, 728 (Iowa 1971).
The children involved are Bryan, ten, Colleen, eight, and Neil, six. Their parents Raymond and Nellie Karwath asked to be relieved of their care and custody in January 1970. The father was unemployed and indigent and the mother emotionally ill. The children were initially placed in St. Vincent's Home. They were adjudged dependent after hearing in June 1970 and legal custody was given to Scott County Department of Social Services for foster home placement. Bryan and Neil were placed in one home and Colleen in another.
On July 7, 1971, juvenile court hearing was held upon the department's application for authorization for surgical removal of the children's tonsils and adenoids. The father resisted. All medical evidence supported the application.
Bryan started getting sore throats in March 1971. They brought sneezing, coughing and difficulty in breathing through his nose. The combined discomfort caused him to miss school several times. During about his fourth sore throat he was seen by Dr. E. L. Manning, a specialist, who noted markedly enlarged and inflamed tonsils and prescribed medication. Although some relief followed, the condition persisted and tonsilloadenoidectomy was scheduled for June 8, 1971, but has not yet been done because of this controversy.
Neil had sore throats from the time he was first placed in foster care. Dr. Manning found his tonsils enlarged and inflamed in June 1971, and he had middle ear infection in both ears. He was also scheduled for June 8, 1971, surgery.
Dr. Manning believed both boys needed their tonsils and adenoids out to prevent further middle ear infections and tonsillitis. Hearing loss and rheumatic fever are possible results of continuing recurrence. Present emergency did not exist, but the surgery was needed within a matter of weeks.
Colleen was first seen in September 1970 by Dr. B. E. Hoenk, also a specialist. He observed enlarged and inflamed tonsils and adenoids and recommended they be removed. In December 1970 Colleen had inflamed adenoids and acute ear infection. Despite medication she continued to carry fluid behind her right eardrum and the tonsil and adenoid condition persisted. By June 1971 her right eardrum had thickened. Although her hearing was clinically normal, Dr. Hoenk believed the tonsils and adenoids urgently needed removal. The surgery could wait a few days or weeks but not months or years.
When asked to state his objection to his children's surgery, Mr. Karwath said:
He based his convictions on 'religious faith' not further explained. He did not oppose medication or surgery but asked six months' delay to see if surgery was still advised. He wanted chiropractic, medication and the surgery resorted to in that order. He claimed Colleen's problem had been helped in the past by three or four months' chiropractic treatments. Even at the end of six months he would not agree to surgery without taking the children to several doctors himself to get 'a fresh opinion without all the history dug up.'
This court stayed the surgery to permit appeal. The sole issue is whether the evidence supports the order for surgery against the father's wishes.
These children were adjudged dependent because their parents desired to be relieved of their care and custody. § 232.2(14)(c), The Code. Legal custody was placed in the county department of social services pursuant to Code § 232.33(3)(b). Legal custody imposes a duty to provide 'food, clothing, housing, education, and necessary medical care, all subject to residual parental rights and responsibilities * * *.' § 232.2(9), The Code. When a child is removed from parental control the court 'shall secure for him care as nearly as possible equivalent to that which he should have been given.' § 232.1, The Code. The objective is the child's best interest and welfare. In re Delaney, Supra.
Here we have a conflict between legal custodian and holder of residual parental rights as to what medical care is in these children's best interests, and the juvenile court sided with the legal custodian. Appellant claims a showing of medical crisis demonstrating an immediate threat to life and limb is essential before that result is justified. We do not agree.
The State has a duty to see children receive proper care and treatment. In re Loeffelholz, 162 N.W.2d 415 (Iowa 1968). This means parents have no right to deprive their children of proper medical care. The legal custodian's statutory duty to provide...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Eric B., In re
...to correct a physical deformity, notwithstanding parental objection and the lack of immediate medical necessity. In In re Karwath (Iowa 1972) 199 N.W.2d 147, the Supreme Court of Iowa upheld a lower court order that the adenoids and tonsils be removed from children over a parent's religious......
-
Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. Saikewicz
...N.Y.2d 900, 328 N.Y.S.2d 686, 278 N.E.2d 915 (1972); In re Weberlist, 79 Misc.2d 753, 360 N.Y.S.2d 783 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1974); In re Karwath, 199 N.W.2d 147 (Iowa 1972). This survey of recent decisions involving the difficult question of the right of an individual to refuse medical intervention ......
-
Appeal In Cochise County Juvenile Action No. 5666-J, Matter of, 15808-PR
...instances where the state interfered in the parent-child relationship because of a present need of medical attention. In re Karwath, 199 N.W.2d 147 (Iowa 1972) (child's health endangered if tonsils not removed); Custody of a Minor, 375 Mass. 733, 379 N.E.2d 1053 (1978) (child had leukemia a......
-
Stamford Hosp. v. Vega
...See, e.g., In re Guardianship of Browning, 568 So.2d 4 (Fla.1990); In re L.H.R., 253 Ga. 439, 321 S.E.2d 716 (1984); In re Karwath, 199 N.W.2d 147 (Iowa 1972); Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. Saikewicz, 373 Mass. 728, 370 N.E.2d 417 (1977); In re Gardner, 534 A.2d 947 (Me.1987......
-
Religious Healing in the Courts: the Liberties and Liabilities of Patients, Parents, and Healers
...by sickle-cell anemia, In re Cabrera, 552 A.2d 1114 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1989), warranted medical intervention. See generally In re Karwath, 199 N.W.2d 147 (Iowa 1972) (approving surgical removal of tonsils and adenoids over the father's religious 324. See In re Cochise County, 650 P.2d 467 (Ari......
-
Playing the odds or playing God? Limiting parental ability to create disabled children through preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
...(emphasis added). (154) See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Barnhart, 497 A.2d 616, 623-25 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1985). (155) See, e.g., In re Karwath, 199 N.W.2d 147, 150 (Iowa (156) Id. (157) Id. at 150. (158) ROBERTSON, supra note 1, at 171. (159) In re Seiferth, 127 N.E.2d 820, 823 (N.Y. 1955). (160) ......