Kauffman v. Osser
Decision Date | 20 January 1971 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 70-2432. |
Citation | 321 F. Supp. 327 |
Parties | Sylvia KAUFFMAN and Phyllis Gitlin v. Maurice S. OSSER, Thomas P. McHenry and Louis Menna, County Commissioners of Philadelphia County sitting as County Board of Elections, and Vincent Gaitley, Chief Clerk County Board of Elections. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Sheldon W. Farber, Norristown, Pa., for plaintiffs.
Edward G. Bauer, Jr., City Sol., John M. McNally, Jr., Asst. City Sol., Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.
Before HASTIE, Circuit Judge, and LORD and HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judges.
Plaintiffs, registered voters who are enrolled as members of the Democratic Party, seek injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 19831 restraining the defendant state election officials from issuing and counting civilian absentee ballots in general elections2 pursuant to Pub.L. No. 375 (Dec. 11, 1968), which amended the absentee voter provisions of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Election Code of 1937, 25 Pa.Stat.Ann. § 3149.1 (1963), as amended, 25 Pa.Stat. Ann. § 3146.1 (Supp.1970). The plaintiffs also seek a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (Supp. 1970) that P.L. 375 violates the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The complaint was filed on September 4, 1970, and on September 24, 1970, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. A hearing was set for September 28, 1970, before the three-judge court which had been convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281-2284. That hearing was adjourned after a short time in order to allow counsel to take certain depositions and to enter, if possible, into stipulations of fact. Depositions were taken, a stipulation was entered into, and on October 9, 1970, the case was submitted to the court as if on final hearing.3
However, while a person who fulfills the state's age, residency, and citizenship requirements and who registers4 to vote is entitled to vote, in fact he can only do so if he conforms to the state's requirements relating to the receipt and casting of ballots.
The election can be contested after the results are in on the ground that, inter alia, unqualified voters participated. 25 Pa.Stat.Ann. § 3326 (1963).
The county election board decides whether or not to issue an absentee ballot on the basis of the information in the absentee application and the permanent registration card. Not less than five days before the election the board must post a complete list of persons to whom absentee ballots have been issued. 25 Pa.Stat.Ann. § 3146.2c (Supp.1970). Approval of an application by the Board is a final and binding decision, except that challenges may be made on the ground that the applicant did not qualify as an absentee elector if such challenge is made by 5:00 P.M. on the Friday before the election. 25 Pa.Stat.Ann. § 3146.2b (Supp.1970).
All challenges to absentee applications and absentee ballots require a deposit of ten dollars, which sum is only refunded if the challenge is sustained or the challenge is withdrawn within five days after the primary or election. 25 Pa.Stat. Ann. § 3146.8(f) (Supp.1970).
In evaluating the contention that Pennsylvania's civilian absentee elector provisions (P.L. 375) deprive plaintiffs of their constitutional rights, we consider the following evidence which we find as facts.
1. Plaintiffs are citizens of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and residents of the City and County of Philadelphia, residing respectively at 13th Street and Lindley Avenue and at 3900 Ford Road; they are registered voters who are enrolled as members of the Democratic Party and who intend to vote in person at their proper polling places in the general election of 1970 and at succeeding elections thereafter.
2. Defendants Osser, McHenry and Menna, County Commissioners of Philadelphia sitting in their capacity as the County Board of Elections, and defendant Gaitley, the Chief Clerk of that Board of Elections, will act pursuant to the provisions of P.L. 375.
3. Approximately two to three percent of the registered voters of Pennsylvania will vote by absentee ballot in the November, 1970, election.
4. In the general election of 1969, the only general election yet held in Pennsylvania under the present absentee voter provisions, the Democratic candidate for statewide office received, in the County of Philadelphia 48.24% of all votes cast in person at the polls and 41.23% of all civilian absentee votes. In Montgomery County, the Republican candidate received a share of the absentee vote 7.67 percentage points higher than his share of the votes at the polls.
5. Before the enactment of P.L. 375 approximately 35-50% of absentee applicants could be challenged successfully. The main ground for successful challenge was that the applicant—though entitled to vote—failed to qualify as an absentee elector.
6. (a) The county board of elections in Philadelphia is approximately one block removed from the county registration commission and can accommodate eight persons examining applications for absentee ballots.
(b) The county board of elections in Montgomery County is one floor above the county registration commission and can accommodate six persons examining absentee ballot applications.
(c) The county board of elections in Delaware County is across the corridor (approximately 60 feet) from the county registration commission and can accommodate five persons examining absentee ballot applications.
7. The Montgomery...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pierce v. Allegheny County Bd. of Elections
...of voters, the predominant remedy is either to count the votes or to have a new election. See, e.g., Kauffman v. Osser, 321 F.Supp. 327, 334 (E.D.Pa.1971) (counting the absentee ballots); In re Contest of 1979 General Election, 489 Pa. 404, 414 A.2d 310, 317 (1980) (counting all ballots wit......
-
Trinsey v. COM. OF PA., DEPT. OF STATE
...(1941) ("The right of the people to choose ... is a right established and guaranteed by the Constitution"); see also Kauffman v. Osser, 321 F.Supp. 327, 333 (E.D.Pa. 1971) (right to vote for members of Congress fundamentally based on Qualifications Clauses in the Constitution). It is well e......
-
Williams v. Osser
...the defendants are performing state functions in determining the eligibility of persons to vote in a state election. See Kauffman v. Osser, 321 F.Supp. 327 (E.D.Pa.1971); Gilhool v. Chairman and Commissioners, Philadelphia County Board of Elections et al., 306 F.Supp. 1202 (E.D.Pa.1969), af......
-
In re Petition To Establish Election Dist.
...is built, is the right to vote. Our courts have gone so far as to declare that the right to vote is fundamental. See Kaufman v. Osser, 321 F.Supp. 327, (1972). For courts to deprive a citizen of his right to vote by adopting the township position is unthinkable. We are aware that if the new......