Keane v. McFee
Decision Date | 29 October 1954 |
Docket Number | No. 8122,8122 |
Citation | 275 P.2d 960,75 Idaho 541 |
Parties | F. C. KEANE and Eugene F. McCann, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. A. F. McFEE, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
Harold S. Purdy and Robert V. Glasby, Coeur d'Alene, for appellant.
James P. Keane, Wallace, for respondents.
Respondents sued on an alleged account stated as of March 14, 1951 for $11,603.23 for legal services rendered appellant by respondents from April 1946, evidently to the date of the account; and $300 a month retainer from March 15 to September 15, 1951; the balance for both, on the date of suit November 12, 1951, being $7,482.28; asking for a lien on a check for $9,289.66 made by one Munter payable to respondents and appellant, the claimed proceeds of litigation in the State of Washington transacted by respondents and Munter for appellant, said check being placed by respondents with the clerk of the trial court when suit was filed.
Appellant's answer denied there was an account stated, or that he owed respondents $7,482.28 or any sum in excess of $430.51, which he deposited in court for respondents' acceptance; and as affirmative defense admitted employing respondents as counsel, but denied any agreement as to the value of such services, 'but accepting plaintiffs figures said defendant has paid to said plaintiffs without questioning plaintiffs accounting, the sum of $24,982.75.'
Testimony by respondents and Irene Vermillion, their secretary from May 1, 1944 to December 30, 1950; detailed conferences with appellant, checking of accounts, books records, reductions, concessions and readjustment of the parties' respective claims, thus culminating:
Exhibit No. 1 (detailed debits and credits with pencil notation thereon of the elimination of $2700.00) for identification, will you state what it is? A. That is a memorandum of the figures--the debits and credits of the account between Keane and McCann and A. F. McFee which was agreed upon at the first conference that I have been discussing.
Exhibit No. 1 that you have heretofore testified to? A. Yes, there is a pencil notation after one of the items checked which had been paid to us by Mr. McFee 10/5/50.
* * *
* * *
Exhibit No. 1, the last typewritten figure, is so labeled.
* * *
* * *
Exhibit No. 1 for identification, could you state what that is? A. That is a statement for services rendered by McCann and myself and other incidental expenses together with certain credits given Mr. McFee. It was made up after--after completion of this discussion, which I think occurred on Sunday March 11th.
Exhibit No. 1. Could you state whose writing that is? A. That is mine.
Exhibit No. 1? A. I gave Mr. McFee a copy or the original, I imagine. I imagine I probably gave him the original--I don't know--of that statement. Some of it was probably on about the 13th or 14th of March.
'Q. Did you see Mr. McFee after that date? A. Yes, I did.
'Q. Where did you see him? A. Saw him in my office again. Mr. McCann was also called over to the office.
'Q. Who called him? A. I did.
'Q. Will you relate what conversation took place at that time? A. There was a complaint on Mr. McFee's part with reference to some nine months that he was originally charged with during the month of '46. He claimed that Mr. Horning had acted and had billed him--I don't know whether he said 'paid him for his services rendered during the year 1946.'
'Q. What took place then? A. Mr. McCann was agreeable again to cutting the nine months in '46 for--always with the proviso that the account be straightened out at once.
* * *
* * *
Exhibit No. 1. A. Yes. Now, at that time I wrote upon Mr. McFee's copy of the statement 'Adjustment, April, December, 1946 $2700.00' and then subtracted that amount from the balance of $11,603.26.
'Q. Was that made in the presence of---- A. That was made in the presence of Mr. McFee and his copy was also given to him with that notation in pencil made by me on it.
* * *
* * *
'Q. Directing your attention, Mrs. Vermillion to on or about March 11th, 1951, do you recall anything that occurred on that date? A. Yes.
'Q. Would you relate that? * * *
'Q. Would you relate what occurred on that date? A. I was called to the office, which was on Sunday, and I went up to the office in the Gyde-Taylor building. Mr. Keane, Mr. McCann, Mr. McFee, Mrs. Poska and Mr. Emacio were there, and I made up a list of charges and credits in the Keane & McCann account for Mr. McFee and Mr. McFee's account and they checked over the credits at that time.
'Q. Did you render a statement prior to that date? A. No.
'Q. You had not? A. Not that I recall.
'Q. And who went over the credits and debits with you? A. I believe everyone checked over them against their ledger sheets that they had.
'Q. 'They had'? Who do you mean? A. That is Mr. McFee, Mrs. Poska and Mr. Emacio.
Exhibit No. 1, will you state what that is? A. That is a statement that was made up a few days after the Sunday listing the charges which were against Mr. McFee and credits which had been paid by Mr. McFee to Mr. Keane and Mr. McCann.
'
Exhibit No. 1? A. From work sheets we had in the office and other information Mr. Keane gave me the day that I typed this up.
'Mr. Keane: I offer Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 1 in evidence.
'Mr. Purdy: We have no objection.
'The Court: It will be admitted.'
There was evidence to the effect appellant made payments on this account from time to time, without objecting to its correctness.
There was extensive cross-examination of respondents as to various phases of the negotiations and other typewritten statements from respondents' and appellant's files of accounts, none of which was shown of claimed to have been agreed upon, evidently presented to impeach Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 1 or to obfuscate respondents' showing that said Exhibit was the correct and final account stated.
Appellant was not asked and did not categorically, or otherwise, deny the testimony of respondents above set forth, that on March 14, 1951 he accepted and agreed to the account as correct. He was cross-examined as to various legal controversies in which respondents or other attorneys putatively rendered services to him, eliciting no definite monetary charges, debits or credits. Appellant, largely through the testimony of Mrs. Cantrell, his bookkeeper, from her examination of his books and the account as presented in Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 1 and some 24 canceled checks payable to respondents--one to appellant's Company with a notation thereon 'Cash to F. C. Keane'--and drawn by or on behalf of appellant or his Company, sought to show the account as tendered and claimed to be stated and agreed upon by respondents was incorrect. Mrs. Cantrell thus summarized her examination:
'Q. But it was after March 14th? A. '51, yes.
'
* * *
* * *
...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Penrose v. Commercial Travelers Ins. Co.
-
Holmes v. Potts
...S.W. 1084. Judgment for plaintiff reversed for error in excluding evidence of improbability. A recent Idaho case, Keane v. McFee, 75 Idaho 541, 275 P.2d 960, at page 968, states: 'This conclusion is further strengthened by the proposition that under a general denial, a defendant may show an......
-
Republic Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Duncan
...client for legal services is not such release of possession as to destroy the attorney's retaining lien thereon. See F.C. Keane v. A.F. McFee, 275 P.2d 960 (Ida.1954) citing American National Bank v. Funk, supra. Accordingly, in the present case, Keel's release of the draft to be deposited ......
-
The Treatment of Attorney's Liens in Colorado
...will be recognized in the absence of misconduct justifying disbarment. 18. The Flush, 277 F.25 (2nd Cir. 1921). 19. In Keane v. McFee, 275 P.2d 960 (Idaho 1954), the court preserved the attorney's lien on funds surrendered into the court registry in the course of a fee dispute. However, the......