Keane v. State
| Decision Date | 04 April 1978 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 76-2701 and 77-18,s. 76-2701 and 77-18 |
| Citation | 357 So.2d 457 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Parties | Cindy KEANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. George Robert DEVINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jerry L. Schwarz, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
The defendants were convicted of robbery. They appeal and raise several points, two of which require reversal.
Firstly, we hold that the trial court erred in refusing to allow the defendants to cross-examine the alleged victim as to a pending criminal charge against him to which he had pleaded guilty. When a prosecution witness is under criminal charges at the time he testifies, the defense is entitled to bring this fact out. Blanco v. State, 353 So.2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Redden v. Wainwright, 340 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Fulton v. State, 335 So.2d 280 (Fla.1976); Morrell v. State, 297 So.2d 579 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).
Secondly, we concluded that the comments and repeated interjections by the trial court during the course of the trial deprived the defendants of a fair trial. No purpose would be served in setting out the numerous gratuitous comments and interjections by the trial judge during the course of the trial. This court's admonition in Hunter v. State, 314 So.2d 174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), is applicable to the present case.
REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pope v. Wainwright
...DCA 1980) (harsh rebuke of defense counsel in presence of jury abridged defendant's fundamental right to a fair trial); Keane v. State, 357 So.2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) (numerous gratuitous comments and interjections by trial judge during course of trial deprived defendant of a fair The on......
-
Reyes v. State
...v. Int'l Patrol & Detective Agency, Inc., 483 So.2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 492 So.2d 1333 (Fla.1986); Keane v. State, 357 So.2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Abrams v. State, 326 So.2d 211 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). In the case before us, the trial judge departed from his impartial role and......
-
Wilkerson v. State, BM-314
...remarks, the trial court abused its discretion in rebuking defense counsel in the presence of the jury. Similarly, in Keane v. State, 357 So.2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), the 4th DCA found that numerous gratuitous comments and interjections by the trial judge during course of trial deprived t......