Keel v. State
| Decision Date | 10 January 1963 |
| Docket Number | 6 Div. 927 |
| Citation | 274 Ala. 350,148 So.2d 625 |
| Parties | Lee Jackson KEEL v. STATE of Alabama. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Jas. L. Shores, Jr., Birmingham, for petitioner.
MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Ed Brogden, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.
This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review and revise the judgment of the Court of Appeals in the case of Keel v. State, 148 So.2d 624.
The Court of Appeals rendered no opinion in the case, simply writing upon the record 'Affirmed (No op) Price, J.'
We have held that in the absence of an opinion by the Court of Appeals we have nothing to review. Lancaster v. State, 258 Ala. 636, 64 So.2d 603, and cases cited; Hathcock v. State, 259 Ala. 363, 66 So.2d 927; Graves v. State, 260 Ala. 352, 70 So.2d 808; Sartain v. State, 263 Ala. 395, 82 So.2d 347.
It follows that the writ must be denied.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wheat v. State, 8 Div. 268
...Ala. 84, 181 So.2d 898; Gandy v. State, 276 Ala. 409, 410, 162 So.2d 620; Crawford v. State, 276 Ala. 98, 159 So.2d 457; Keel v. State, 274 Ala. 350, 148 So.2d 625. Neither a constitutional question (see: Wright v. State, supra; Gandy v. State, supra) nor a federal question (see: Early v. S......
- Tate v. Tate, 7 Div. 589