Keelyn v. Carolina Mut. Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Decision Date26 October 1898
Citation90 F. 29
CourtU.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
PartiesKEELYN v. CAROLINA MUT. TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. AMERICAN BONDING & TRUST CO. OF BALTIMORE CITY v. SAME et al.

Mordecai & Gadsden, for employes, etc.

E. W Hughes, for purchaser.

SIMONTON Circuit Judge.

This case comes up upon claims made by persons who have furnished supplies to the Carolina Mutual Telephone & Telegraph Company and others who have been employed by it. The supplies are of material essentially necessary in keeping up and maintaining the telegraph lines. The employes are ladies who have been employed at the telephone exchange and the superintendent in charge. It is admitted that these employes are not protected under the labor acts of the general assembly of South Carolina. If they can be protected at all, it must be under the doctrine established in Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U.S. 235. This was the first of a series of cases which recognize that claims may exist against an insolvent railroad company which are superior to the lien of a mortgage debt. The theory is that railroads are a peculiar property, of a public nature, discharging a great public work. They cannot be built without the interposition of the sovereign power. When built, they serve a great public purpose. Railroads connect distant points. That they are common carriers is but a small part of their office. They are not only the arteries of trade. They civilize, develop, and enrich large sections of country. Cities, towns, and villages, farms and factories spring up on their line. They make intercommunication of vital importance to thousands. They are the means of transporting troops, munitions of war, and supplies promoting and preserving tranquility in times of peace, and connecting and creating strategic points in times of war. They are public highways. Public interest-- the highest public interest-- requires that when constructed they be kept up,-- be kept, as the phrase is, a 'going concern.' Being so important, the courts look with favor upon everything which keeps a railroad a going concern. To this end, the first application of its earnings must be made. The stockholder subscribes, and the bondholder lends, his money with knowledge of this. Neither of them can get anything until the current expenses are paid. Upon this assurance, all persons who furnish labor and supplies are encouraged to give credit to the railroad and to contribute to keeping it a going concern; and if,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Title Ins. & Trust Co. v. Home Telephone Co. of Puget Sound
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • November 7, 1912
    ... ... telephones in Tacoma and Bellingham; the Home Telephone & ... Telegraph Company of Portland, with a system of telephones in ... Portland, Or.; ... 5, Sec ... 6449, citing cases; Keelyn & Carolina Mutual Tel. & Tel. Co ... (C.C.) 90 F. 29; Louisville & N.R ... ...
  • In re Chicago Express, Incorporated
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 30, 1963
    ...than railroads,6 the lower federal courts have extended the rule to public and quasi-public service companies. Keelyn v. Carolina Mut. Tel. & Tel. Co., 90 F. 29 (C.C.D.S. C.1898) (telephone and telegraph company); Central Trust Co. v. Clark, 81 F. 269 (8 Cir. 1897) (street railway); Atlanti......
  • In re Hallmark Medical Services, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • May 18, 1973
    ...2 Cir. 1914, 216 F. 458; Louisville and Nashville RR. Co. v. Memphis Gas Light Co., 6 Cir. 1903, 125 F. 97; Keelyn v. Carolina Mutual Telephone & Telegraph Co., 4 Cir. 1898, 90 F. 29; Reyburn v. Consumers Gas, Fuel, and Light Co., 1887, N.D.Ill., 29 F. 561; 6A Collier on Bankruptcy § 9.13(5......
  • Citizens Trust Company v. National Equipment And Supply Company
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 21, 1912
    ... ... corporations, other than railroads. Keelyn v ... Carolina Mut. Telephone, etc., Co. (1898), 90 F ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT