Keenan v. Hall

Decision Date11 February 1998
Docket NumberNo. 94-35726,94-35726
Citation135 F.3d 1318
PartiesCharles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

AND REJECTING EN BANC REQUEST

ORDER

The opinion, Slip op. 5571, filed May 8, 1996 is amended as follows: add a footnote to "major difference between the conditions for the general prison population and the segregated population" in line 2 on page 5578 of the Slip op.: "The Court expressed it thusly: 'Based on a comparison between inmates inside and outside disciplinary segregation, the State's actions in placing [Sandin] there for 30 days did not work a major disruption in his environment.' Sandin at 486, 115 S.Ct. at 2301."

With this change, Judges Schroeder and Fletcher have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judge Rymer voted to grant the petition for rehearing and to accept the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

To continue reading

Request your trial
687 cases
  • Adkins v. Kernan
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 24 Junio 2019
    ...Cir. 2009); Johnson v. Lewis, 217 F.3d 726, 732 (9th Cir. 2000); Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1091 (9th Cir. 1996), amended by 135 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir. 1998). fact that the food occasionally contains foreign objects or sometimes is served cold, while unpleasant, does not amount to a constit......
  • McElroy v. Gomez, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00658-NONE-SAB (PC)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 9 Noviembre 2020
    ...food is a basic human need protected by the Eighth Amendment. See Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1091 (9th Cir. 1996), amended, 135 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir. 1998). The Eighth Amendment right to food was clearly established as of at least 2001. Foster v. Runnels, 554 F.3d 807, 815 (9th Cir. 2009).......
  • Saavedra v. Kernan
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 24 Junio 2016
    ...to continuous and long-term segregation. Keenan v. Hall (9th Cir. 1996) 83 F.3d 1083, 1089-90, opinion amended on denial of reh'g (9th Cir. 1998) 135 F.3d 1318. Moreover, "inmates have the right to personal hygiene supplies such as toothbrushes and soap. Keenan, 83 F.3d at 1091; see also Ho......
  • Gray v. Hernandez
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • 27 Agosto 2009
    ...a violation of due process. Id. at 485, 115 S.Ct. 2293; see also Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1088-89 (9th Cir.1996), amended by 135 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir.1998). As discussed above, even under a liberal construction of the Complaint, Plaintiff does not offer allegations that suggest his time ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT