Keenan v. Hall
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
| Writing for the Court | With this change |
| Citation | Keenan v. Hall, 135 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir. 1998) |
| Decision Date | 11 February 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. 94-35726,94-35726 |
| Parties | Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
AND REJECTING EN BANC REQUEST
ORDER
The opinion, Slip op. 5571, filed May 8, 1996 is amended as follows: add a footnote to "major difference between the conditions for the general prison population and the segregated population" in line 2 on page 5578 of the Slip op.:
With this change, Judges Schroeder and Fletcher have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judge Rymer voted to grant the petition for rehearing and to accept the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
732 cases
-
Adkins v. Kernan
...Cir. 2009); Johnson v. Lewis, 217 F.3d 726, 732 (9th Cir. 2000); Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1091 (9th Cir. 1996), amended by 135 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir. 1998). fact that the food occasionally contains foreign objects or sometimes is served cold, while unpleasant, does not amount to a constit......
-
McElroy v. Gomez, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00658-NONE-SAB (PC)
...food is a basic human need protected by the Eighth Amendment. See Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1091 (9th Cir. 1996), amended, 135 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir. 1998). The Eighth Amendment right to food was clearly established as of at least 2001. Foster v. Runnels, 554 F.3d 807, 815 (9th Cir. 2009).......
-
Saavedra v. Kernan
...to continuous and long-term segregation. Keenan v. Hall (9th Cir. 1996) 83 F.3d 1083, 1089-90, opinion amended on denial of reh'g (9th Cir. 1998) 135 F.3d 1318. Moreover, "inmates have the right to personal hygiene supplies such as toothbrushes and soap. Keenan, 83 F.3d at 1091; see also Ho......
-
Gray v. Hernandez
...a violation of due process. Id. at 485, 115 S.Ct. 2293; see also Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1088-89 (9th Cir.1996), amended by 135 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir.1998). As discussed above, even under a liberal construction of the Complaint, Plaintiff does not offer allegations that suggest his time ......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
A. Your First Amendment Right to Freedom of Speech and Association
...binding of hardback books seems inapplicable to newspapers and potentially the binding of other paperback books. And in Keenan v. Hall, 135 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir. 1998) a court noted that in Bell, the Supreme Court relied on the fact that prisoners were allowed other reading material besides h......
-
23-c-4 Other Environmental Health and Safety Cases
...violate a prisoner's Eighth Amendment rights. 118. Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1090 (9th Cir. 1996) opinion amended on denial of reh'g, 135 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir. 1998) (finding it to be cruel and unusual punishment to deprive a prisoner of outdoor exercise for six 119. Gates v. Cook, 376 F.......
