Kehoe v. Segal

Decision Date30 May 2000
CitationKehoe v. Segal, 272 AD2d 583, 709 N.Y.S.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesJOHN F. KEHOE, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>GEORGE SEGAL et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, and PAUL KELLOFF, Appellant.<BR>J.C. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant.

Bracken, J. P., Joy, Thompson, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To hold a subcontractor or statutory agent of the owner or general contractor absolutely liable for violations of Labor Law §§ 240 and 241, there must be a showing that the subcontractor had the authority to supervise and control the work giving rise to these duties (see, Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 NY2d 494, 500; Russin v Picciano & Son, 54 NY2d 311, 318). The determinative factor on the issue of control is not whether a subcontractor furnishes equipment but whether it has control of the work being done and the authority to insist that proper safety practices be followed (see, Serpe v Eyris Prods., 243 AD2d 375, 380; Iveson v Sweet Assocs., 203 AD2d 741, 742). Similarly, liability against a subcontractor based upon a claimed violation of Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence requires a showing that authority was conferred on the subcontractor to supervise and control the activity which produced the injury (see, Rizzuto v Wenger Contr. Co., 91 NY2d 343, 352; Comes v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 82 NY2d 876, 877; Russin v Picciano & Son, supra, at 317; Goettelman v Indeck Energy Servs., 262 AD2d 958; Rice v City of Cortland, 262 AD2d 770; Mocarska v 200 Madison Assocs., 262 AD2d 163).

Here, there exist issues of fact as to whether the defendant Paul Kelloff was a subcontractor of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Grochowski v. Ben Rubins, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 1, 2011
    ... ... Kehoe v. Segal, 272 A.D.2d 583, 584, 709 N.Y.S.2d 817). "The determinative factor on the issue of control is not whether a subcontractor furnishes ... ...
  • Van Blerkom v. Am. Painting, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 20, 2014
    ... ... DRA, Inc., 75 A.D.3d 543, 544–545, 904 N.Y.S.2d 767; Torres v. LPE Land Dev. & Constr., Inc., 54 A.D.3d 668, 669, 863 N.Y.S.2d 477; Kehoe v. Segal, 272 A.D.2d 583, 584, 709 N.Y.S.2d 817). “The determinative factor is whether the party had the right to exercise control over the work, ... ...
  • Temperino v. DRA, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 13, 2010
    ... ... Law §§ 240 and 241, there must be a showing that [it] had the authority to supervise and control the work giving rise to these duties" ( Kehoe v. Segal, 272 A.D.2d 583, 584, 709 N.Y.S.2d 817). "The determinative factor on the issue of control is not whether a subcontractor furnishes ... ...
  • Judice v. DeAngelo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 30, 2000
  • Get Started for Free