Keller v. Fournier

Decision Date30 September 1874
PartiesPETER KELLERv.ERNST FOURNIER et al.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. JOSEPH E. GARY, Judge, presiding. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the appellees against the appellant, upon a promissory note.

Mr. THOMAS SHIRLEY, for the appellant.

Messrs. MCCLELLAN & HODGES, for the appellees.

Per CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county.

The error assigned is, that the cause was advanced under the “five-day” rule of the court below, and tried by the court out of its order on the docket, contrary to the provision of the general practice act. It is sufficient to remark that the bill of exceptions does not show that objection was made and exception taken to the trying of the case out of its order on the docket. The bill of exceptions should show that to have been done, in order to avail of the error assigned. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Oberne v. Gaylord
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • March 31, 1883
    ...v. Creed, 1 Bradwell, 557; Drury v. Dungan, 2 Bradwell, 15; Reynolds v. Palmer, 70 Ill. 288; Fuller v. Bates, 6 Bradwell, 442; Keller v. Fournier, 74 Ill. 489; Indianapolis, etc. v. Rhodes, 76 Ill. 285; Krug v. Ward, 77 Ill. 603; Protection, etc. v. Foote, 79 Ill. 361; Page v. The People, 9......
  • People v. Tompkins
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • September 30, 1874

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT