Kelley v. State, 29099

Decision Date10 May 1954
Docket NumberNo. 29099,29099
PartiesKELLEY v. STATE.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

William L. Travis, Palmer C. Singleton, Jr., Hammond, for appellant.

Edwin K. Steers, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Owen S. Boling, Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard M. Givan, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.

GILKISON, Judge.

In the trial court appellant was charged by an affidavit in two counts.

By count one, he was charged with involuntary manslaughter, in the death of one Robert Howard Smith, while he, appellant, was committing certain unlawful acts, to-wit: driving his automobile into the intersection of 4th Avenue and Grant Street in the city of Gray at a time when the traffic controls there were showing 'red' against traffic proceeding in the direction as said Edward J. Kelley was then driving his automobile, and driving his automobile at such time and place while the said Kelley was under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

But upon trial of the case by jury appellant was found not guilty of manslaughter and the court rendered judgment thereon in his favor. We shall therefore give no further attention to count one.

After the evidence was fully heard and each of the parties had rested, defendant moved that certain parts of count two be stricken out, which motion was sustained by the court, and said parts were stricken. Thereafter the state moved to strike out certain additional parts of count two, which motion was sustained and said parts were stricken. All this was done without objection from either side. Thereafter count two of the affidavit was as follows:

'Affiant, being duly sworn, upon his oath says that be is informed and does verily believe that on or about the 22nd day of November, 1952, at and in the County of Lake, and State of Indiana, Edward J. Kelley did then and there unlawfully, while driving and operating an automobile at the intersection of 4th Avenue and Grant Street, public highways in the City of Gary, County and State aforesaid, cause an injury to the person of one Robert Howard Smith, and did then and there leave the place of such accident without stopping and giving his name, residence street and number and license number, then and there being contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State of Indiana.'

After due deliberation the jury returned its verdict finding defendant guilty of leaving the scene of the accident as charged in count two and fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the state prison for one year and by a fine of $5,000.

On May 15, 1953, and before a judgment was rendered on the verdict last noted, defendant filed his motion in arrest of judgment on the verdict rendered on count two of the amended affidavit for the cause:

'That the facts stated in the amended affidavit do not constitute a public offense.'

The second count of the affidavit must be based upon §§ 47-1910 and 47-1912, Burns' 1952 Repl., which are as follows:

'(a) The driver of any vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to or death of any person shall immediately stop such vehicle at the scene of such accident or as close thereto as possible, and shall then forthwith return to and in every event shall remain at the scene of the accident until he has fulfilled the requirements of section 41 ( § 47-1912). Every such stop shall be made without obstructing traffic more than is necessary.

'(b) Any person failing to stop or to comply with said requirements under such circumstances shall upon conviction be punished by imprisonment for not less than ten (10) days nor more than one (1) year or by fine of not less than ten dollars ($10.00) nor more than five thousand dollars ($5,000), or by both such fine and imprisonment.' Sec. 47-1910, Burns' 1952 Repl.

'The driver of any vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to or death of any person or damage to any vehicle which is driven or attended by any person shall give his name, address, and the registration number of the vehicle he is driving and shall upon request exhibit his driving license to the person struck or to the driver or occupant of, or person attending any vehicle collided with, and shall render to any person injured in such accident reasonable assistance, including the carrying or the making of arrangements for the carrying of such person to a physician, surgeon, or hospital for medical or surgical treatment, if it is apparent that such treatment is necessary or if such carrying is requested by the injured person.' Sec. 47-1912, Burns' 1952 Repl.

Of course in Indiana, all crimes are statutory. Sec. 9-2401, Burns' 1942 Repl. We must look to the two statutes quoted above to ascertain what averments must be contained in the affidavit in question in order to charge appellant with a public offense. Section 47-1912, Burns' 1952 Repl., defines that part of the crime attempted to be charged in count two of the affidavit quite specifically with respect to giving information and rendering aid. It provides that 'The driver of any vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to or death of any person or damage to any vehicle which is driven or attended by any person shall give his name, address and the registration number of the vehicle he is driving and shall upon request exhibit his driving license to the person struck or to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Spranger v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 15 de outubro de 1986
    ...and provided for although the court may think the legislature should have made them more comprehensive." Kelly v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 294, 298, 119 N.E.2d 322, 324. Although I.C. Sec. 36-5-7-4 is not a penal or criminal statute, it does give content to a criminal statute, specifically I.......
  • Johnson v. Burke
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 10 de março de 1958
    ...clearly proves a uniform act can be defective just the same as any other act not properly drafted may be defective. Kelley v. State, 1954, 233 Ind. 294, 119 N.E.2d 322; McClanahan v. State, 1953, 232 Ind. 567, 112 N.E.2d In Hyatt v. People of State of New York ex rel. Corkran, 1903, 188 U.S......
  • State v. Sebben
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • 9 de abril de 1971
    ...and broad he could not be charged with knowledge of the duties with which he must comply. Defendant relies heavily on Kelley v. State, 233 Ind. 294, 119 N.E.2d 322, 324. In the cited case defendant was charged in one count with manslaughter and in the other, with leaving the scene of an acc......
  • Hanic v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 30 de junho de 1980
    ...interpreted this section. 1 It is a fundamental rule of construction that penal statutes must be strictly construed. Kelley v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 294, 119 N.E.2d 322; Caudill v. State (1946), 224 Ind. 531, 69 N.E.2d 549; Halligan v. State (1978), Ind.App., 375 N.E.2d 1151. Notwithstandi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT