Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company

Decision Date08 November 1937
Docket NumberNo. 396,396
CitationKellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company, 302 U.S. 777, 58 S.Ct. 139, 82 L.Ed. 601 (1937)
PartiesKELLOGG COMPANY, petitioner, v. NATIONAL BISCUIT COMPANY. *
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Messrs. W. H. Crichton Clarke and Edward S. Rogers, both of New York City, and Robert T. McCracken, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

Messrs. Thomas C. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., David A. Reed, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Drury W. Cooper and Charles A. Vilas, both of New York City, for respondent.

For opinion below, see(C.C.A.)91 F.(2d) 150.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
32 cases
  • Kurn v. Stanfield
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 24, 1940
    ... ... Company appeal from a judgment for personal injuries recovered by ... ...
  • West Virginia State Bar v. Earley
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • June 9, 1959
    ... ... The Connecticut Bank and Trust Company, 20 Conn.Sup. 248, 131 A.2d 646; Smith v. Illinois [144 ... ...
  • State Bar v. Cramer
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • November 1, 1975
    ... ... ; Food and Drug Administration, 21 CFR 2.58, 2.59; National Labor Relations Board, 29 CFR 102.38. See also Social ... ...
  • Bolino v. Illinois Terminal R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 10, 1947
    ... ... Illinois Terminal Railroad Company, Appellant No. 40078 Supreme Court of Missouri March 10, ... ...
  • Get Started for Free