Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company
| Decision Date | 08 November 1937 |
| Docket Number | No. 396,396 |
| Citation | Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company, 302 U.S. 777, 58 S.Ct. 139, 82 L.Ed. 601 (1937) |
| Parties | KELLOGG COMPANY, petitioner, v. NATIONAL BISCUIT COMPANY. * |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. W. H. Crichton Clarke and Edward S. Rogers, both of New York City, and Robert T. McCracken, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Messrs. Thomas C. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., David A. Reed, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Drury W. Cooper and Charles A. Vilas, both of New York City, for respondent.
For opinion below, see(C.C.A.)91 F.(2d) 150.
Petition for rehearing denied.
*Motion denied302 U.S. 654, 58 S.Ct. 280, 82 L.Ed. ——.Second petition for rehearing granted 304 U.S. 586, 58 S.Ct. 1052, 82 L.Ed. ——.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
32 cases
-
Kurn v. Stanfield
... ... Company appeal from a judgment for personal injuries recovered by ... ...
-
West Virginia State Bar v. Earley
... ... The Connecticut Bank and Trust Company, 20 Conn.Sup. 248, 131 A.2d 646; Smith v. Illinois [144 ... ...
-
State Bar v. Cramer
... ... ; Food and Drug Administration, 21 CFR 2.58, 2.59; National Labor Relations Board, 29 CFR 102.38. See also Social ... ...
-
Bolino v. Illinois Terminal R. Co.
... ... Illinois Terminal Railroad Company, Appellant No. 40078 Supreme Court of Missouri March 10, ... ...
Get Started for Free