Kelly v. Butler County Board of Commissioners, 16897.

Decision Date26 July 1968
Docket NumberNo. 16897.,16897.
Citation399 F.2d 133
PartiesDenis P. KELLY, Appellant, v. BUTLER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Board of Prison Managers, Butler County Correctional Institution, Thomas Hutchinson, Warden, Butler County Correctional Institution and their Agents.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Denis P. Kelly, pro se.

Charles T. Chew, County Sol., County of Butler, Butler, Pa., for appellee.

Before KALODNER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges, and WRIGHT, District Judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Denis P. Kelly brought suit invoking jurisdiction under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983; seeking money damages for an alleged denial of appellant's right of access to the federal courts by appellees and also for alleged cruel and unusual treatment accorded appellant by the appellees during the period June 20 to July 7, 1966.1

The District Court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) without a hearing stating that "a more detailed pleading is necessary * * * for the purpose of informing any judge to whom resort is had that the claim is not frivolous."

In addition, the District Court, relying upon Cooper v. Hutchinson, 184 F.2d 119 (3rd Cir. 1950) and Gaito v. Prasse, 312 F.2d 169 (3rd Cir. 1963), indicated that it ought to abstain from interfering with state procedure, except in exceptional cases, until the complainant had exhausted his state remedies. We note, however, that the position taken in those cases has been severely undercut by Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961) and McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 83 S.Ct. 1433, 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963) which held that exhaustion of state remedies was not a prerequisite to obtaining legal relief under the Civil Rights Acts.2

Moreover, several recent decisions of this Court, United States of America ex rel. William Sanders v. Maroney, 397 F.2d 267 (3rd Cir. June 27, 1968) and Long v. Parker, 390 F.2d 816 (3rd Cir. Feb. 16, 1968) require that in cases like the instant one, the lower court must grant a hearing so that the facts underlying the allegations of the appellant's complaint may be fully developed and considered. This is particularly true where, as here, the complainant is proceeding pro se and is untutored in legal niceties.3

For the foregoing reasons, the order of the District Court will be vacated and the cause remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

1 For a detailed recitation of the acts complained of, see this Court's prior opinion in this case, Kelly v. Butler County Board of Commissioners, 399 F.2d 132 (3rd Cir. 1967).

2 For a case...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Flood v. Margis
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • January 15, 1971
    ...of civil rights should be liberally construed. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L. Ed.2d 80 (1957); Kelly v. Butler County Bd. of Com'rs, 399 F.2d 133 (3d Cir.1968); Weaver v. Pate, 390 F.2d 145 (7th Cir.1968); Eaton v. Bibb, 217 F.2d 446, 448 (7th Cir.1954), cert. denied, 350 ......
  • Bethea v. Crouse, 2-68
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • December 3, 1969
    ...under the Civil Rights Act. See Cooper v. Pate, supra; Wright v. McMann, 387 F.2d 519 (2d Cir. 1967); Kelly v. Butler County Board of Commissioners, 399 F.2d 133 (3rd Cir. 1968); Edwards v. Duncan, 355 F.2d 993 (4th Cir. 1966); Hughes v. Noble, 295 F.2d 495 (5th Cir. 1961); Spires v. Bottor......
  • United States ex rel. Gittlemacker v. County of Philadelphia
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • July 10, 1969
    ...rights, the court should endeavor to construe his pleadings without regard for technicalities. See, e. g., Kelly v. Butler County Board of Com'rs., 399 F.2d 133, 134-135 (3 Cir. 1968); Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455 (3 Cir. 1969). "`In appraising the sufficiency of a complaint we follo......
  • Haakenson v. Parkhouse
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • April 20, 1970
    ...the Civil Rights Act. McNeese v. Board of Educ., 373 U.S. 668, 671-674, 83 S.Ct. 1433, 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Kelly v. Butler County Bd. of Comm'rs, 399 F.2d 133 (C.A. 3, 1968). All the motions to dismiss maintain that the complaint fails to state a claim under the Civil Rights Act. Plainti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT