Kelly v. LaShawn

Decision Date10 January 1994
Docket NumberNo. 93-724.,93-724.
Citation510 U.S. 1044
PartiesKelly, Mayor of the District of Columbia, et al. v. LaShawn A., by Her Next Friend, Moore, et al.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Appeal from the C. A. D. C. Cir.

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 990 F. 2d 1319.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • LaShawn A. v. Barry
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 9 d2 Julho d2 1996
    ...statutory issues." LaShawn A. ex rel. Moore v. Kelly, 990 F.2d 1319, 1324 (D.C.Cir.1993) ("LaShawn I"), cert. denied, 510 U.S.1044, 114 S.Ct. 691, 126 L.Ed.2d 659 (1994). Under District law, children reported to have been abused or neglected had a private right of action to enforce the Dist......
  • People United for Children v. City of New York, 99 Civ. 0648(RJW).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 18 d2 Julho d2 2000
    ... ... In La Shawn A. v. Kelly, 990 F.2d 1319 (D.C.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044, 114 S.Ct. 691, 126 L.Ed.2d 659 (1994), plaintiffs brought a class action law suit on ... ...
  • District of Columbia v. Pizzulli, 03-CV-1036.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • 8 d4 Fevereiro d4 2007
    ... ... of Columbia's Child and Family Services Agency ("CFSA") while the CFSA was in receivership pursuant to what was commonly known as the LaShawn order. 1 ...         In its order establishing the receivership, issued on August 24, 1995, the United States District Court granted the ... See generally LaShawn A. v. Barry, 330 U.S.App. D.C. 204, 144 F.3d 847 (1998); LaShawn A. v. Kelly, 887 F.Supp. 297 (D.D.C. 1995); LaShawn A. v. Dixon, 762 F.Supp. 959 (D.D.C.1991). On January 27, 1994, the District Court issued a remedial order ... ...
  • Handy v. Shaw, Bransford, Veilleux & Roth, 01-7129.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 18 d5 Abril d5 2003
    ... ... of D.C., 732 F.2d 949, 950 (D.C.Cir.1984) (application of Pullman abstention); but see id. at 953 & n. 20 (Robinson, C.J., dissenting). See LaShawn A. v. Kelly, 990 F.2d 1319, 1322 (D.C.Cir.1993) ("This Court has never decided whether the District of Columbia is a state for Younger abstention ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT