Kelly v. Williams
Decision Date | 27 March 1933 |
Docket Number | 7019. |
Citation | 21 P.2d 58,94 Mont. 19 |
Parties | KELLY v. WILLIAMS. |
Court | Montana Supreme Court |
Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; Frank L. Riley, Judge.
Action by Kate Kelly against Joseph H. Williams, as administrator of the estate of J. D. Kelly, deceased, who was substituted for original defendant. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Reversed and remanded, with directions.
Freeman, Thelen & Freeman, of Great Falls, for appellant.
N. A. Rotering, of Butte, for respondent.
This action, brought by the plaintiff against her husband, is grounded upon an alleged tort caused by her husband in negligently operating an automobile in which she was riding. During the pendency of the action the husband died, and Williams, the administrator of his estate, was substituted as party defendant. The plaintiff received judgment, from which the defendant appealed.
The case is ruled directly by the decision of this court in Conley v. Conley, 92 Mont. 425, 15 P.2d 922, wherein it was held that the Montana Married Women's Act does not authorize a married woman to sue her husband for a personal tort. All the points presented to support the judgment here were decided adversely to plaintiff's arguments in the Conley Case. It is worthy of remark that the Legislature seems satisfied with the statutory construction announced in that case, which was decided October 26, 1932. During its recent session a bill designed to enlarge the rights of the spouses to sue one another, including actions for personal torts, did not receive favorable action even in the house in which it originated.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded to the district court of Silver Bow county, with direction to dismiss the action.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Courtney v. Courtney
...with her husband or next friend (Henneger v. Lomas, 145 Ind. 287, 44 N.E. 462, 32 L.R.A. 848; Hobbs v. Hobbs, 70 Me. 381; Kelly v. Williams, 94 Mont. 19, 21 P.2d 58; Perlman v. Brooklyn City Ry. Co., 117 Misc. 353, N.Y.S. 891, affirmed, 202 A.D. 822, 194 N.Y.S. 971, and Thompson v. Thompson......
-
Miller v. Fallon County
...refused to abolish the doctrine of interspousal tort immunity. Conley v. Conley (1932), 92 Mont. 425, 15 P.2d 922; Kelly v. Williams (1933), 94 Mont. 19, 21 P.2d 58; State ex rel. Angvall v. District Court (1968), 151 Mont. 483, 444 P.2d 370; and State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Lea......
-
Primmer v. Carter County
... ... assembled, and therefore he had no valid claim to assign to ... the plaintiff, citing Williams v. Board of County ... Commissioners, 28 Mont. 360, 72 P. 755, and certain ... other decisions having little application. On this phase of ... the ... ...
- State v. Whitmore