Kemp v. Reinhard
Decision Date | 02 May 1910 |
Docket Number | 194 |
Parties | Kemp, Appellant, v. Reinhard |
Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Argued February 28, 1910
Appeal, No. 194, Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from judgment of C.P. Berks Co., April T., 1909, No. 17, for defendant on case stated in suit of Jacob E. Kemp v. Valerius S. Reinhard and Pierce G. S. Kemp. Affirmed.
Case stated to determine the marketable title to real estate. Before ENDLICH, P.J.
From the record it appeared that the material portions of the will of Amelia Sunday under which plaintiff claimed title were as follows:
Defendant refused to take plaintiff's title.
The court in an opinion by ENDLICH, J., entered judgment for defendant.
Error assigned was in entering judgment for defendant on case stated.
Judgment affirmed.
Isaac Hiester, for appellant. -- The main devise without any implication arising from the words "die without leaving issue" is a limitation of an estate tail: Angle v. Brosius, 43 Pa. 187; Grimes v. Shirk, 169 Pa. 74; Elliott v. Pearsoll, 8 W. & S. 38; McIntyre v. Ramsey, 23 Pa. 317; Philadelphia, etc., Co.'s App., 93 Pa. 209; Potts's App., 30 Pa. 168; Allen v. Markle, 36 Pa. 117; Wynn v. Story, 38 Pa. 166; Auman v. Auman, 21 Pa. 343; Steacy v. Rice, 27 Pa. 75; Kleppner v. Laverty, 70 Pa. 70; Bassett v. Hawk, 118 Pa. 94; Carter v. McMichael, 10 S. & R. 429; Paxson v. Lefferts, 3 Rawle, 59; George v. Morgan, 16 Pa. 95.
The words "die without leaving issue" do not import a definite failure of issue under the Act of July 9, 1897, P.L. 213, when a contrary intention appears by the will and such contrary intention does appear where the preceding gift without any implication arising from such words is a limitation of an estate tail to the first taker: Re O'Bierne, 1 Jones & LaTouche, 352; Dawson v. Small, 10 Eng. Ruling Cases, 847; Dilworth v. Schuylkill Improvement Land Co., 219 Pa. 527; Hastings v. Engle, 217 Pa. 419; Lewis v. Link Belt Co., 222 Pa. 139.
F. A. Marx, with him C. H. Ruhl, for appellee. -- The rule in Shelly's case has no application: Guthrie's App., 37 Pa. 9; Findlay v. Riddle, 3 Binn. 139; Ingersoll's App., 86 Pa. 240; Shaner v. Wilson, 207 Pa. 550; Mulliken v. Earnshaw, 209 Pa. 226; Todd v. Armstrong, 213 Pa. 570; Wood v. Schoen, 216 Pa. 425; Taylor v. Taylor, 63 Pa. 481; Daley v. Koons, 90 Pa. 246; Elliott v. Pearsoll, 8 W. & S. 38.
Before FELL, C.J., BROWN, MESTREZAT, POTTER and STEWART, JJ.
The testatrix gave to her son, Jacob E. Kemp, the use and income of seven enumerated properties "for and during his lifetime." Immediately after this provision for him there is the following separate clause in the will: The judgment of the court below on the case stated to determine whether the appellant had a fee simple in the properties was that he took but a life...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kemp v. Reinhard
... 77 A. 436228 Pa. 143 KEMP v. REINHARD et al. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. May 2, 1910. 77 A. 436 Appeal from Court of Common Pleas, Berks County. Action by Jacob E. Kemp against Valerius S. Reinhard and Pierce G. S. Kemp. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. From the......