Ken Hood Const. Co. v. Pacific Coast Const., Inc.
| Decision Date | 06 September 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. S53723.,S53723. |
| Citation | 341 Or. 366,143 P.3d 239 |
| Parties | KEN HOOD CONST. CO. v. PACIFIC COAST CONST., INC. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Petition for review denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
14 cases
-
Wieck v. Hostetter
...Ken Hood Construction v. Pacific Coast Construction, 201 Or.App. 568, 577, 120 P.3d 6 (2005), adh'd to as modified on recons., 203 Or.App. 768, 126 P.3d 1254, rev. den., 341 Or. 366, 143 P.3d 239 (2006). A "contract is most commonly formed by an offer, an acceptance of that offer, and an ex......
-
In re Schnitzer
... ... Const., Art. I, 46, already requiredequal treatment of ... See Batzer Construction, Inc. v. Boyer , 204 Or. App. 309, 314, 129 P.3d 773, ... ...
-
Moyer v. Columbia State Bank
...Ken Hood Construction v. Pacific Coast Construction, 201 Or. App. 568, 577, 120 P.3d 6 (2005), adh'd to as modified on recons ., 203 Or. App. 768, 126 P.3d 1254, rev. den. , 341 Or. 366, 143 P.3d 239 (2006). A contract does not arise because one party desires it; there must be mutual assent......
-
Gillett v. Tucker
...enforceable agreement normally displace any claim of unjust enrichment within their reach."); Ken Hood Construction Co. v. Pacific Coast Construction, Inc. , 203 Or. App. 768, 772, 126 P.3d 1254, rev. den. , 341 Or. 366, 143 P.3d 239 (2006) ("It is well established that there cannot be a va......
Get Started for Free