Kendrick v. Pippin
| Docket Number | 09SC781 |
| Decision Date | 09 May 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
-
Ledbetter v. Howard
...contained material weighing on decision]. 24. See, Marquez v. City of Albuquerque, 399 F.3d 1216 (10th Cir.2005); Kendrick v. Pippin, 252 P.3d 1052 (Colo.2011); Meyer v. State, 119 Nev. 554, 80 P.3d 447 (2003); State v. Mann, 131 N.M. 459, 39 P.3d 124 (2002); People v. Maragh, 94 N.Y.2d 569......
-
State v. Ford
...introduction of legal content or specific factual information learned from outside the record can be a fine one." Kendrick v. Pippin , 252 P.3d 1052, 1066 (Colo.2011). But "[t]he test requires that the experience used by the juror in deliberations be part of the juror's background, gained b......
-
People v. Pena-Rodriguez
...whether the jury was affected by extraneous influences or outside information is a mixed question of law and fact. Kendrick v. Pippin, 252 P.3d 1052, 1064 (Colo.2011). We review legal conclusions de novo, while reviewing factual determinations for an abuse of discretion. Id.B. Law¶ 27 CRE 6......
-
People v. Clark
...in fact communicated to the jury." Destination Travel, Inc., 799 P.2d at 457 (citing Wiser, 732 P.2d at 1143 ); cf. Kendrick v. Pippin, 252 P.3d 1052, 1063 (Colo.2011) (concluding an evidentiary hearing was not required because affidavit alleging juror misconduct relied exclusively on the j......
Request a trial to view additional results