Kenicott v. the Supervisors
Decision Date | 01 December 1872 |
Citation | 16 Wall. 452,21 L.Ed. 319,83 U.S. 452 |
Parties | KENICOTT v. THE SUPERVISORS |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for the Southern District of Illinois; the case being thus:
The Central Railroad of Illinois runs, in a large part of its course, north and south through the State just named. The great extent of its course, and the important places through which it passes or to which it leads, made it a matter very desirable to the towns in adjoining districts on the east and west of it to connect themselves by other railroads with it. Among the towns on the east, and about eighteen miles to the east of the road, was Mount Vernon, a place situate in Jefferson County, a county on the east of the road, whose course runs parallel to the whole of the western line of the county. This town, moving early in the matter, the legislature of Illinois, in February, 1855, chartered a company, called the Mount Vernon Railroad Company, whose immediate purpose was, with the aid of a mortgage on certain lands in Jefferson County, known as the 'swamp and overflowed lands,' to build a road from Mount Vernon, in Jefferson County aforesaid, to the Illinois Central. Such a road, of course, would run west through the estern part of Jefferson County, cross its western line, and connect soon after with the desired trunk of the Illinois Central.
The charter, in its seventh, eighth, and ninth sections, reads thus:
But in addition to the sections thus quoted followed another and very important one in these words:
So far as to Jefferson County; and this 10th section.
On the east again of Jefferson County, and, like it, having 'swamp and overflowed lands,' and like it interested in gaining a connection with the great trunk of the Illinois Central, was Wayne County; the west line of this county being about eleven miles east of the town of Mount Vernon.
On the same day of February, 1855, when the charter already mentioned was granted, a charter had been granted to another company, named the Belleville and Fairfield Railroad Company, whose purpose was the construction of a road from Belleville (a place in Illinois near St. Louis, and west of the Illinois Central), through Nashville (Illinois) and Mount Vernon, to Fairfield, a place in Illinois nearly east of Mount Vernon, and so finally to Louisville, Kentucky. This road, which ran from west to east, was chartered so as to run through both the counties of Jefferson and Wayne, and by the terms of the 10th section of the Mount Vernon road might 'be joined, connected, or intersected' with it.
This charter to the Belleville and Fairfield road being in existence, the County Court of Wayne County, on the 1 th of March, 1856, made a deed of its swamp lands to one Charles Wood, in trust for that company or any other company that would build a railroad through the county. This deed recited that a connection had been made between the Mount Vernon and the Belleville and Fairfield roads, by which the latter would become a part of and elongation of the former; that the power to appropriate the swamp lands in Wayne County through which the said road was situated was brought into operation; that a vote had been taken in November, 1855, to appropriate and donate said lands for the purpose of aiding in constructing the said road, and that this power had been conferred by the 9th section of the charter of the Mount Vernon company, and that in execution of such authority and power the deed was made by the County Court. The deed contained a proviso, that if the road should not be made in a certain time the land should be reconveyed by Wood to the county.
An act of the Illinois legislature, passed February 14th, 1857, amendatory of the charter of this Belleville and Fairfield company, and extending its line of transit, changed the name of the company to 'The St. Louis and Louisville Railroad Company.' The proposed line of the road as thus enlarged crossed the Illinois Central and was located directly through five different counties, of which Wayne was one. The act declared:
In this state of things the county of Wayne held an election in November, 1858, in which the question was thus proposed to the voters:
'For appropriating the swamp lands of Wayne County as a bonus to any company for building a railroad through said county.
'Against the same.'
A majority of votes was cast in favor of the proposition, and thereupon soon after this time two persons, named Van Duser and Smith, entered into a contract with Wayne County for building that part of the road of the Belleville and Fairfield company (or, as it now was, the St. Louis and Louisville company) lying between the east line of Wayne County and Mount Vernon, thus running across the entire width of Wayne County. This contract having been partially executed by Van Duser and Smith was assigned to the Mount Vernon Railroad Company, in which they had become the chief stockholders, and that company undertook the construction of this portion of the road.
The county of Jefferson entered into a like contract for the construction of the Mount Vernon road, from Mount Vernon to the Illinois Central.
On the 20th of April, 1859, S. J. Wilson and T. M. Scott, judges of the County Court of Wayne County, mortgaged the whole, about 100,000 acres, of the swamp and overflowed lands of the county to Isaac Seymour, of New York, in trust to secure the payment of bonds to the amount of $800,000, to be issued by the Mount Vernon Railroad Company. The recitals of the mortgage ran thus:
'WHEREAS, The Congress of the United States duly passed an act, approved September the 28th, A.D. 1850, entitled 'An act to enable the State of Arkansas and other States to reclaim the swamp lands within their limits,' and in pursuance thereof the Secretary of the Interior of the United States caused a patent to be issued to the State of Illinois for all the swamp and overflowed lands within its limits, to be situated under the direction of the commissioners of the Land Office:
'And whereas, The legislature of the said State of Illinois passed an act, approved by the governor of said State on the 22d of January, A.D. 1852, entitled 'An act to dispose of the swamp and overflowed lands, and to pay the expenses o selecting and surveying the same,' which said act authorized the appropriation and disposal of said lands for such purposes as may be deemed expedient by the court or county judges:
'And whereas, The legislature of the State of Illinois passed an act, approved by the governor of said State on the 15th of February, A.D. 1855, entitled 'An act to incorporate the Mount Vernon Railroad Company,' whereby all such persons and corporations as shall become stockholders under the provisions of the said act, and their successors, were duly incorporated into a body politic and corporate under the name of the Mount Vernon Railroad Company, and the parties of the first part were duly authorized and empowered to make such disposition of the swamp and overflowed lands within the said county of Wayne, in aid of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
I IS Ljo State v. County Court Op Wirt County.
......, February 28, 1866, March 4, 1868, February 19, 1870, and February 28, 1872, are constitutional; and the bonds issued by the board of supervisors of Wirt county by authority thereof are valid. 2. Mandamus County Court Bonds Mandamus is the proper remedy to compel ......
-
First Nat. Bank v. Obion County
...liability thereon as against a bona fide holder for value. Mercer County v. Hackett, 68 U. S. 83, 17 L. Ed. 548; Kenicott v. Wayne County, 83 U. S. 452, 466, 21 L. Ed. 319; Coloma v. Eaves, 92 U. S. 484, 23 L. Ed. 579; Moultre County v. Bank, 92 U. S. 631, 23 L. Ed. 631; Marcy v. Oswego, 92......
-
Vickery v. Burton
...as the note free of equities. 1 Jones Morts. § § 834-840; Beals v. Neddo, 2 F. 41; Carpenter v. Langan, 16 Wall. 271; Renicott v. Supervisors, 16 Wall. 452; Sawyer Picket, 19 Wall. 146; Hayden v. Drury, 3 F. 782; Swett v. Stark, 31 F. 858; Sprague v. Graham, 29 Me. 160; Pierce v. Fannee, 47......
-
Lakos v. Saliaris
...paid for services, or upon a consideration in addition to or in excess of that which would ordinarily be given". Kenicott v. Wayne County, 16 Wall. 452, 471, 21 L.Ed. 319; George A. Fuller Co. v. Brown, 4 Cir., 15 F.2d 672, 676; Noel v. Parrott, 4 Cir., 15 F.2d 669, 671; Bass v. Hawley, 5 C......