Kennedy v. Gibson
Decision Date | 12 March 1904 |
Docket Number | 13,326 |
Citation | 68 Kan. 612,75 P. 1044 |
Parties | DAVID KENNEDY AND MAGGIE KENNEDY v. CHARLES E. GIBSON |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided January, 1904.
Error from Ellis district court; LEE MONROE, judge.
To continue reading
Request your trial19 cases
-
Casper v. Bell's Estate
... ... 879; ... Burnes v. Ballenger, 76 Mo.App. 58; Givens v ... Rogers, 182 S.W. 115; Walter v. Kilpatrick, 191 ... N.C. 458, 132 S.E. 148; Kennedy v. Gibson, 68 Kan ... 612, 75 P. 1044; Bowman v. Rutter, 47 S.W. 52; ... Sherwood v. Wilkins, 65 Ark, 312, 45 S.W. 988; ... Insurance Co. of N.A ... ...
-
Ivy v. Evans
... ... v. Worley, 26 Mo. 253; Hawes v. Mulholland, 78 ... Mo.App. 493; Bircher v. Payne, 7 Mo. 462; Atwood ... v. Lewis, 6 Mo. 392; Kennedy v. Gibson, 68 Kan ... 612; Gorrell v. Home Life Ins. Co., of New York, 63 ... F. 371; Lane v. Manning, 8 Yerger (Tenn.), 435; ... Goddard ... ...
-
Clark v. Paddock
...in the mortgage of the payees named in the note was not fatal to the security and that the note itself would prevail. In Kennedy v. Gibson, 68 Kan. 612, 75 P. 1044, the provided that a default should mature the whole debt at the option of the holder thereof, while the mortgage provided that......
-
Voris v. Birdsall
...which created no presumption that facts impeaching its validity were brought to the notice of the bank or its managers. Kennedy v. Gibson, 68 Kan. 612, 75 P. 1044. This rule of law placing the burden upon the holder of paper fraudulently obtained appears to have been overlooked; as the cour......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Judicial Foreclosures in Kansas: Recent Developments Following the Subprime Mortgage Crisis
...the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the holder exercises the option to accelerate the entire amount. Kennedy v. Gibson, 68 Kan. 612, 617, 75 P 1044 (1904). If the holder elects not to exercise the option upon default, then "the statute would not run earlier than the time ......
-
Judicial Foreclosures in Kansas: Recent Developments Following the Subprime Mortgage Crisis
...the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the holder exercises the option to accelerate the entire amount. Kennedy v. Gibson, 68 Kan. 612, 617, 75 P. 1044 (1904). If the holder elects not to exercise the option upon default, then “the statute would not run earlier than the time......