KENNY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Allen, 13791.
Decision Date | 17 October 1957 |
Docket Number | No. 13791.,13791. |
Citation | 248 F.2d 656,101 US App. DC 334 |
Parties | KENNY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. Herschel H. ALLEN et al., t/a J. E. Greiner Company, Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
Mr. Justin L. Edgerton, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. John Wattawa, Charles E. Pledger, Jr., Randolph C. Richardson and John F. Mahoney, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Alexander M. Heron, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. H. Mason Welch, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees. Messrs. J. Harry Welch and J. Joseph Barse, Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for appellees.
Before PRETTYMAN, WILBUR K. MILLER, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.
The District of Columbia, a municipal corporation, undertook the construction of certain public works. It engaged as consulting engineers Allen, Jenkins, Allen, et al., a partnership of six members trading as J. E. Greiner Company and resident in Baltimore. Kenny Construction Company, Inc., was awarded the contract of construction. Next door to the contemplated site was Greenway, Inc., a rental housing development. As the excavation proceeded, the surrounding earth settled, and Greenway claimed it was damaged. It sued Kenny and the District of Columbia. Kenny sought to implead Allen, Jenkins, Allen, et al., the designers of the plans for the work. Its problem was to get effective service on the Baltimore partnership or the partners. Among other efforts to that end it served process on the Clerk of the Municipal Court for the District of Columbia as agent of the partners. The contract between Allen, Jenkins, Allen, et al., and the District of Columbia contained a clause which read:
This language made the Clerk of the Municipal Court the agent of each of the partners in Allen, Jenkins, Allen, et al., for service of process in "any" lawsuit "pertaining to" the work under this contract. The case at...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
National Equipment Rental, Ltd v. Szukhent
...court, to permit notice to be served by the opposing party, or even to waive notice altogether. See, e.g., Kenny Construction Co. v. Allen, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 334, 248 F.2d 656 (1957); Bowles v. J. J. Schmitt & Co., Inc., 170 F.2d 617 (C.A.2d Cir. 1948); Gilbert v. Burnstine, 255 N.Y. 348, 17......
-
Smith-Johnson Motor Corp. v. Hoffman Motors Corp.
...court, to permit notice to be served by the opposing party, or even to waive notice altogether. See, e. g., Kenny Construction Co. v. Allen, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 334, 248 F.2d 656 (1957); Bowles v. Schmitt & Co., Inc., 170 F.2d 617 (C.A.2d Cir. 1948); Gilbert v. Burnstine, 255 N.Y. 348, 174 N.E......
-
National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Szukhent
...business transactions. Furthermore, the opinion of the majority would appear to be in conflict with Kenny Construction Co. v. Allen, 101 U.S. App.D.C. 334, 248 F.2d 656 (1957) and Green Mountain College v. Levine, 120 Vt. 332, 139 A.2d 882 Plaintiff, a Delaware corporation with its principa......
-
Beckman v. Greentree Securities, Inc.
...Min. Co.], 43 Misc.2d 27, 29, 250 N.Y.S.2d 151; see also, Pohlers v. Exeter Mfg. Co., 293 N.Y. 274, 279, 56 N.E.2d 582; Kenny Constr. Co. v. Allen, D.C.Cir., 248 F.2d 656 [upholding contractual designation of agent for service of process]; Restatement [Second] of Agency, ch. 8, Introductory......