Kent v. City of Columbia Falls
| Docket Number | DA 14-0309 |
| Decision Date | 19 May 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 cases
-
Md. Cas. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Court
...for a stand-alone duty based on mere foreseeability of harm and related public policy considerations. Citing Kent v. City of Columbia Falls , 2015 MT 139, 379 Mont. 190, 350 P.3d 9 ; Vesel ; Stewart ; Jim’s Excavating Service ; Redies v. Attorneys Liability Protection Society , 2007 MT 9, 3......
-
Ferreira v. City of Binghamton
...a plaintiff in a way that would give rise to a tort action were the harm committed by a private actor (see Kent v. City of Columbia Falls, 379 Mont. 190, 201, 350 P.3d 9 [2015] ["(C)ourts should first determine whether a governmental defendant has a specific duty to a plaintiff arising from......
-
Ferreira v. City of Binghamton
...a plaintiff in a way that would give rise to a tort action were the harm committed by a private actor (see Kent v. City of Columbia Falls, 379 Mont. 190, 201, 350 P.3d 9 [2015] ["(C)ourts should first determine whether a governmental defendant has a specific duty to a plaintiff arising from......
-
Estate of Representative v. State
...law framework that we often avoid—and we should finally cut bait and abandon it altogether. Cf. Kent v. City of Columbia Falls, 379 Mont. 190, 350 P.3d 9, 21 (2015) (Cotter, J., concurring) (suggesting the public-duty doctrine may no longer be viable in Montana and asserting the courts in t......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The Sovereign in Commerce.
...liability refuge where similar conduct undertaken by a private person would result in liability. See, e.g., Kent v. City of Columbia Falls, 350 P.3d 9, 16-17 (Mont. 2015) (discussing Montana law); Catone v. Medberry, 555 A.2d 328, 333 (R.I. 1989) (applying Rhode Island law). In the State of......