Keown v. West Jersey Title & Guaranty Co.

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation390 A.2d 715,161 N.J.Super. 19
Decision Date07 July 1978
PartiesWilliam S. KEOWN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WEST JERSEY TITLE AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Page 19

161 N.J.Super. 19
390 A.2d 715
William S. KEOWN, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
WEST JERSEY TITLE AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a New Jersey
corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 13, 1978.
Decided July 7, 1978.

[390 A.2d 716]

Page 22

Joseph S. Georgiana, Camden, for defendant-appellant (Capehart & Scatchard, Camden, attorneys).

M. Gene Haeberle, Camden, for plaintiff-respondent.

John R. Weigel, Princeton, for amicus curiae, N.J. Land Title Ins. Ass'n.

Before Judges MATTHEWS, CRANE and ANTELL.

[390 A.2d 717] PER CURIAM.

The facts of this case are set forth in the trial judge's opinion, which is reported at 147 N.J.Super. 427, 431-433, 371 A.2d 370.

The trial judge decided that plaintiff's lack of authority to invest in real estate created a defect in his title and rendered it unmarketable, 147 N.J.Super. at 436, 371 A.2d 370; that the exemption for defects created by the insured did not cover

Page 23

accidental or innocent conduct of the insured, so conduct of this type causing a defect would not prevent recovery on the policy, 147 N.J.Super. at 439, 371 A.2d 370; that plaintiff's conduct was no worse than simple negligence, so it was not conduct that would exempt the resulting defect from coverage, 147 N.J.Super. at 443, 371 A.2d 370, and that the title company was estopped from denying liability because it represented to Keown's secretary on the telephone that Keown had the "right to take title." 147 N.J.Super. at 445, 371 A.2d 370.

A marketable title is one that is relatively free from doubt, such that in a suit for specific performance a court would compel the prospective purchaser to accept the title. 4 American Law of Property § 18.7 at 670 (1952). If it is reasonably probable that the purchaser would be exposed to litigation not of a frivolous nature concerning the title, or would have to bring an action to quiet title, then specific performance would be denied to the prospective seller and the title would be considered unmarketable. Tillotson v. Gesner, 33 N.J.Eq. 313, 326-327 (E. & A.1880); Gaub v. Nassau Homes, Inc., 53 N.J.Super. 209, 223, 147 A.2d 73 (App.Div.1958).

Marketable title has also been defined as a title free from reasonable doubt, that which a reasonable buyer would be willing to accept, or which is "salable." Bier v. Walbaum, 102 N.J.L. 368, 370, 131 A. 888 (E. & A.1926).

When a trustee breaches his trust by purchasing property that is not within his authority to purchase, the beneficiaries have the options of compelling him to replace the trust funds with interest or to hold the property subject to the trust. 3 Scott, Trusts (3 ed. 1967), § 210 at 1695-1696; Restatement, Trusts 2d, § 210 (1959). If the beneficiaries charge the trustee with the amount he spent, they can enforce an equitable lien on the property as security for their claim. However, this does not prevent the trustee from disposing of the property. A trustee takes the risk of acting Ultra vires, and if he does so he will be held personally liable for any loss to the trust. Dickerson v. Camden Trust Co., 140 N.J. Eq. 34, 44, 53 A.2d 225 (Ch.1947), mod. on other grounds 1 N.J.

Page 24

459, 64 A.2d 214 (1949); Conover v. Guarantee Trust Co., 88 N.J.Eq. 450, 458-459, 463, 102 A. 844 (Ch.1917), aff'd 89 N.J.Eq. 584, 585, 106 A. 890 (E. & A.1918). Because he is personally subject to liability for any losses, he is not required to hold the property in case it might be advantageous for the trust, but is permitted to dispose of it. 3 Scott, Op. cit., § 210 at 1697-1698. Under those circumstances it can hardly be said that a trustee in this position will be unable to pass good title.

A trustee's lack of authority under the trust instrument to purchase real estate does not void the conveyance to him. We see no reason, then, that his title should be impaired. Because of the possibility of an equitable lien held by the beneficiaries it might be prudent to arrange for them to release their claims by signing the deed, but such does not make the title unmarketable. The beneficiaries are not adverse parties but are the beneficial owners through the trustee. Since they challenged the trustee's powers in court and received an order surcharging him, they have obviously chosen the option of repudiating the purchase and cannot make a claim on the property at a later date.

All of the cases we have found in which unmarketability of title resulted involved a defect which would give rise to some kind of adverse claim on the part of third parties. In Gaub v. Nassau Homes, Inc., 53 N.J.Super. 209, 147 A.2d 73 (App.Div.1958), the description in the deed could be read two ways, making a difference of 25 acres [390 A.2d 718] in the plot, and an heir of a grantor far back in the chain of title could claim that questionable acreage. In United States v. Roebling, 244 F.Supp. 736, 744 (D.N.J.1965), the seller's deed was unclear and could mean that there was a reversionary interest in an earlier grantor and that the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 practice notes
  • Stewart Title Guar. v. Greenlands Realty, L.L.C., No. CIV. A. 97-3577.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • July 20, 1999
    ...Title Guar. Co. v. Greenlands Realty, L.L.C., 58 F.Supp.2d 360, 365-66 (D.N.J. 1999) (quoting Keown v. West Jersey Title & Guar. Co., 161 N.J.Super. 19, 23, 390 A.2d 715 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.1978)). In other words, a title can be burdened with some defects so minimal or trivial that title ......
  • National Mortg. Corp. v. American Title Ins. Co., No. 7815SC587
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • June 19, 1979
    ...scheme, recovery should be denied based on similar policy language. See e. g., Keown v. West Jersey Title and Guaranty Company, 161 N.J.Super. 19, 390 A.2d 715 (1978); Conway v. Title Insurance Co., 291 Ala. 76, 277 So.2d 890 (1973); Feldman v. Urban Commercial, Inc.,87 N.J.Super. 391, 209 ......
  • Walsh Sec., Inc. v. Cristo Prop. Mgmt., Ltd., Civ. No. 97–3496 (DRD).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • April 17, 2012
    ...under a title policy generally engages in “some fraudulent or inequitable behavior.” Keown v. West Jersey Title and Guaranty Co., 161 N.J.Super. 19, 26, 390 A.2d 715 (1978). In contrast, “[t]he term ‘suffer’ implies the power to prevent or hinder, and includes knowledge of what is to be don......
  • Stewart Title Guar. v. Greenlands Realty, L.L.C., Civil Action No. 97-3577.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • May 12, 1999
    ...suit for specific performance a court would compel the prospective purchaser to accept title." Keown v. West Jersey Title & Guar. Co., 161 N.J.Super. 19, 23, 390 A.2d 715 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.1978). A party "will not be compelled to take a conveyance if it be reasonably probable that he wi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
  • Stewart Title Guar. v. Greenlands Realty, L.L.C., No. CIV. A. 97-3577.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • July 20, 1999
    ...Guar. Co. v. Greenlands Realty, L.L.C., 58 F.Supp.2d 360, 365-66 (D.N.J. 1999) (quoting Keown v. West Jersey Title & Guar. Co., 161 N.J.Super. 19, 23, 390 A.2d 715 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.1978)). In other words, a title can be burdened with some defects so minimal or trivial that title is......
  • National Mortg. Corp. v. American Title Ins. Co., No. 7815SC587
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • June 19, 1979
    ...scheme, recovery should be denied based on similar policy language. See e. g., Keown v. West Jersey Title and Guaranty Company, 161 N.J.Super. 19, 390 A.2d 715 (1978); Conway v. Title Insurance Co., 291 Ala. 76, 277 So.2d 890 (1973); Feldman v. Urban Commercial, Inc.,87 N.J.Super. 391, 209 ......
  • Walsh Sec., Inc. v. Cristo Prop. Mgmt., Ltd., Civ. No. 97–3496 (DRD).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • April 17, 2012
    ...under a title policy generally engages in “some fraudulent or inequitable behavior.” Keown v. West Jersey Title and Guaranty Co., 161 N.J.Super. 19, 26, 390 A.2d 715 (1978). In contrast, “[t]he term ‘suffer’ implies the power to prevent or hinder, and includes knowledge of what is to be don......
  • Stewart Title Guar. v. Greenlands Realty, L.L.C., Civil Action No. 97-3577.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • May 12, 1999
    ...specific performance a court would compel the prospective purchaser to accept title." Keown v. West Jersey Title & Guar. Co., 161 N.J.Super. 19, 23, 390 A.2d 715 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.1978). A party "will not be compelled to take a conveyance if it be reasonably probable that ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT