Kessler v. Ensley Land Co.

Decision Date13 December 1906
Docket Number1,556.
Citation148 F. 1019
PartiesKESSLER et al. v. ENSLEY LAND CO. et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

J. A. W. Smith, Wm. A. Gunter, and Thomas M. Steeger, for appellants.

Jno. B. Knox and E. J. Smyer, for appellees.

Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and MEEK, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The matters complained of in the bill were intra vires the Ensley Land Company, and as the record shows that a majority of the directors and stockholders, at the time of bringing the suit, were not interested adversely to the company, the right of the complainants, as stockholders, to bring and maintain this suit, is doubtful. If the complainants can bring and maintain the bill, in prosecuting the same they can only assert the rights and equities which the company itself, if willing to sue, could assert, and any defense good against the Ensley Land Company is good against the complainants. Four years, during which the defendants, the Ensley Company and others, were exploiting the lands in controversy, elapsed before the suit was brought, and we fail to find sufficient evidence to meet the charge of laches. On the facts of the case made in the transcript, we concur with the learned judge whose exhaustive opinion is found in the record. The decree appealed from is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Liken v. Shaffer
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • 26 Enero 1946
    ...the corporation if it sued, is good against a claim asserted in its behalf in a stockholder's derivative suit. Kessler v. Ensley Land Co., 5 Cir., 1906, 148 F. 1019, certiorari denied 205 U.S. 541, 27 S.Ct. 788, 51 L.Ed. 921; DiTomasso v. Loverro, 1937, 250 App.Div. 206, 293 N.Y.S. 912. In ......
  • Amen v. Black, 4962-4964.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 19 Junio 1956
    ...Harris v. Pearsall, 116 Misc. 366, 190 N.Y.S. 61, 75; Fletcher Cyclopedia Corporations, Perm.Ed., Vol. 13, § 6028. 12 Kessler v. Ensley Land Co., D.C., 148 F. 1019, 1020, certiorari denied 205 U.S. 541, 27 S.Ct. 788, 51 L.Ed. 921; Fletcher Cyclopedia Corporations, Perm.Ed., Vol. 13, § 5859.......
  • Stewart v. Johnston, 30415.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 14 Junio 1948
    ... ... Life ... Ins. Co. v. Austin, 168 U.S. 685, 18 S.Ct. 223, 42 L.Ed ... 626; Kessler & Co. v. Ensley Co., C.C., 141 F. 130, ... affirmed, 5 Civ., 148 F. 1019; Certiorari denied, ... ...
  • Holmes v. Jewett
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 7 Julio 1913
    ... ... Snowden, 212 Pa. 249, 61 A. 796, 108 Am.St.Rep. 867; Smith ... v. Ferries, 51 P. 710 [1]; Kessler v. Ensley, 148 F. 1019, 79 ... C.C.A. 534 ... 3. A ... majority of the court are of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT