Kessler v. Ensley Land Co., 1,556.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
| Citation | 148 F. 1019 |
| Docket Number | 1,556. |
| Parties | KESSLER et al. v. ENSLEY LAND CO. et al. |
| Decision Date | 13 December 1906 |
148 F. 1019
KESSLER et al.
v.
ENSLEY LAND CO. et al.
No. 1,556.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
December 13, 1906
J. A. W. Smith, Wm. A. Gunter, and Thomas M. Steeger, for appellants.
Jno. B. Knox and E. J. Smyer, for appellees.
Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and MEEK, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The matters complained of in the bill were intra vires the Ensley Land Company, and as the record shows that a majority of the directors and stockholders, at the time of bringing the suit, were not interested [148 F. 1020.] adversely to the company, the right of the complainants, as stockholders, to bring and maintain this suit, is doubtful. If the complainants can bring and maintain the bill, in prosecuting the same they can only assert the rights and equities which the company itself, if willing to sue, could assert, and any defense good against the Ensley Land Company is good against the complainants. Four years, during which the defendants, the Ensley Company and others, were exploiting the lands in controversy, elapsed before the suit was brought, and we fail to find sufficient evidence to meet the charge of laches. On the facts of the case made in the transcript, we concur with the learned judge whose exhaustive opinion is found in the record. The decree appealed from is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Liken v. Shaffer, Civil Action No. 62.
...if it sued, is good against a claim asserted in its behalf in a stockholder's derivative suit. Kessler v. Ensley Land Co., 5 Cir., 1906, 148 F. 1019, certiorari denied 205 U.S. 541, 27 S.Ct. 788, 51 L.Ed. 921; DiTomasso v. Loverro, 1937, 250 App.Div. 206, 293 N.Y.S. 912. In equity cases whe......
-
Amen v. Black, No. 4962-4964.
...116 Misc. 366, 190 N.Y.S. 61, 75; Fletcher Cyclopedia Corporations, Perm.Ed., Vol. 13, § 6028. 12 Kessler v. Ensley Land Co., D.C., 148 F. 1019, 1020, certiorari denied 205 U.S. 541, 27 S.Ct. 788, 51 L.Ed. 921; Fletcher Cyclopedia Corporations, Perm.Ed., Vol. 13, § 5859. 13 Hawkins v. Glenn......
-
Rogers v. American Can Company, No. 13493-13495.
...578 (5 Cir. 1935). 11 On final hearing the bill was dismissed for laches. Kessler & Co. v. Ensley Co., 141 F. 130 (N.D.Ala.1905), aff'd 148 F. 1019 (5 Cir. 1906), cert. denied 205 U.S. 541, 27 S.Ct. 788, 51 L.Ed. 921 12 The court relied in part on the authority of the English case of Foss v......
-
Stewart v. Johnston, 30415.
...Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Austin, 168 U.S. 685, 18 S.Ct. 223, 42 L.Ed. 626; Kessler & Co. v. Ensley Co., C.C., 141 F. 130, affirmed, 5 Civ., 148 F. 1019; Certiorari denied, 205 U.S. 541, 27 S.Ct. 788, 51 L.Ed. 921; Federal United Corp. v. Havender, 24 Del. Ch. 318, 11 A.2d 331; Windhurst v. Cen......
-
Liken v. Shaffer, Civil Action No. 62.
...if it sued, is good against a claim asserted in its behalf in a stockholder's derivative suit. Kessler v. Ensley Land Co., 5 Cir., 1906, 148 F. 1019, certiorari denied 205 U.S. 541, 27 S.Ct. 788, 51 L.Ed. 921; DiTomasso v. Loverro, 1937, 250 App.Div. 206, 293 N.Y.S. 912. In equity cases whe......
-
Amen v. Black, No. 4962-4964.
...116 Misc. 366, 190 N.Y.S. 61, 75; Fletcher Cyclopedia Corporations, Perm.Ed., Vol. 13, § 6028. 12 Kessler v. Ensley Land Co., D.C., 148 F. 1019, 1020, certiorari denied 205 U.S. 541, 27 S.Ct. 788, 51 L.Ed. 921; Fletcher Cyclopedia Corporations, Perm.Ed., Vol. 13, § 5859. 13 Hawkins v. Glenn......
-
Rogers v. American Can Company, No. 13493-13495.
...578 (5 Cir. 1935). 11 On final hearing the bill was dismissed for laches. Kessler & Co. v. Ensley Co., 141 F. 130 (N.D.Ala.1905), aff'd 148 F. 1019 (5 Cir. 1906), cert. denied 205 U.S. 541, 27 S.Ct. 788, 51 L.Ed. 921 12 The court relied in part on the authority of the English case of Foss v......
-
Stewart v. Johnston, 30415.
...Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Austin, 168 U.S. 685, 18 S.Ct. 223, 42 L.Ed. 626; Kessler & Co. v. Ensley Co., C.C., 141 F. 130, affirmed, 5 Civ., 148 F. 1019; Certiorari denied, 205 U.S. 541, 27 S.Ct. 788, 51 L.Ed. 921; Federal United Corp. v. Havender, 24 Del. Ch. 318, 11 A.2d 331; Windhurst v. Cen......