Kesterson v. Cambo Fotografische Industrie Bv, 8884.

CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
Citation819 N.Y.S.2d 222,2006 NY Slip Op 05109,30 A.D.3d 301
Docket Number8884.
PartiesMATTHEW KESTERSON, Respondent, v. CAMBO FOTOGRAFISCHE INDUSTRIE BV, Appellant, and CALUMET PHOTOGRAPHIC, INC., et al., Respondents.
Decision Date22 June 2006
30 A.D.3d 301
819 N.Y.S.2d 222
2006 NY Slip Op 05109
MATTHEW KESTERSON, Respondent,
v.
CAMBO FOTOGRAFISCHE INDUSTRIE BV, Appellant, and CALUMET PHOTOGRAPHIC, INC., et al., Respondents.
8884.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
June 22, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered October 27, 2005, which, inter alia, denied defendant Cambo's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims by the Calumet defendants, and for the alternative relief of a change of venue on inconvenient forum grounds, unanimously affirmed, without costs.


Notwithstanding its burden in the first instance of showing entitlement to summary judgment on jurisdictional grounds, Cambo failed to demonstrate lack of substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce, or an inability reasonably to anticipate that its allegedly tortious acts would have consequences in this state (see CPLR 302 [a] [3] [ii]). Nor did Cambo demonstrate the requisite hardship to warrant a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 327.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Williams v. Beemiller, Inc., 1438
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • February 9, 2018
    ...Dept. 2010] ; Dreznick v. Lenchner, 41 A.D.3d 769, 770, 838 N.Y.S.2d 781 [2d Dept. 2007] ; Kesterson v. Cambo Fotografische Industrie BV, 30 A.D.3d 301, 301, 819 N.Y.S.2d 222 [1st Dept. 2006] ; Schultz v. Hyman, 201 A.D.2d 956, 957–958, 607 N.Y.S.2d 824 [4th Dept. 1994] ). In determining wh......
1 cases
  • Williams v. Beemiller, Inc., 1438
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • February 9, 2018
    ...Dept. 2010] ; Dreznick v. Lenchner, 41 A.D.3d 769, 770, 838 N.Y.S.2d 781 [2d Dept. 2007] ; Kesterson v. Cambo Fotografische Industrie BV, 30 A.D.3d 301, 301, 819 N.Y.S.2d 222 [1st Dept. 2006] ; Schultz v. Hyman, 201 A.D.2d 956, 957–958, 607 N.Y.S.2d 824 [4th Dept. 1994] ). In determining wh......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT