Kesterson v. Cambo Fotografische Industrie Bv
Decision Date | 22 June 2006 |
Docket Number | 8884. |
Citation | 819 N.Y.S.2d 222,2006 NY Slip Op 05109,30 A.D.3d 301 |
Parties | MATTHEW KESTERSON, Respondent, v. CAMBO FOTOGRAFISCHE INDUSTRIE BV, Appellant, and CALUMET PHOTOGRAPHIC, INC., et al., Respondents. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Notwithstanding its burden in the first instance of showing entitlement to summary judgment on jurisdictional grounds, Cambo failed to demonstrate lack of substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce, or an inability reasonably to anticipate that its allegedly tortious acts would have consequences in this state (see CPLR 302 [a] [3] [ii]). Nor did Cambo demonstrate the requisite hardship to warrant a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 327.
To continue reading
Request your trial2 cases
-
Williams v. Beemiller, Inc.
...[3d Dept. 2010] ; Dreznick v. Lenchner, 41 A.D.3d 769, 770, 838 N.Y.S.2d 781 [2d Dept. 2007] ; Kesterson v. Cambo Fotografische Industrie BV, 30 A.D.3d 301, 301, 819 N.Y.S.2d 222 [1st Dept. 2006] ; Schultz v. Hyman, 201 A.D.2d 956, 957–958, 607 N.Y.S.2d 824 [4th Dept. 1994] ). In determinin......
- In the Matter of Picon v. Johnson