Ketchum Estate v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Docket No. 324741.
Decision Date | 01 March 2016 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 324741. |
Parties | KETCHUM ESTATE v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
Charlotte F. Shoup, PLC, Saint Johns (by Charlotte F. Shoup ), and Chalgian & Tripp Law Offices PLLC, Okemos (by David L. Shaltz ) for the estate of Wilma Frances Ketchum.
Bill Schuette, Attorney General, Aaron D. Lindstrom, Solicitor General, and Brian K. McLaughlin, Assistant Attorney General, for the Department of Health and Human Services.
Barron, Rosenberg, Mayoras & Mayoras, PC (by Amy E. Peterman ), for the Elder Law and Disability Rights Section of the State Bar of Michigan.
Before: BOONSTRA, P.J., and K.F. KELLY and MURRAY, JJ.
This case involves the estate of Wilma Francis Ketchum's attempt to preclude the state Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)1 from recovering from the estate certain amounts that it paid to the decedent, Wilma Ketchum, for Medicaid long-term care benefits during her lifetime. After defendant DHHS initially denied plaintiff estate's request for a hardship waiver, plaintiff requested an administrative hearing that resulted in a proposal for a decision recommending the denial be upheld, which the DHHS's director ultimately followed. Plaintiff then filed an appeal in the circuit court, which overturned the DHHS's decision. We then granted the DHHS's application for leave to appeal, Ketchum Estate v. Dep't of Community Health, unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered April 10, 2015 (Docket No. 324741), limited to the issue raised in the application, MCR 7.205(E)(4). We now reverse.
Mackey v. Dep't of Human Servs., 289 Mich.App. 688, 693, 808 N.W.2d 484 (2010). In 1993, Congress required states to implement Medicaid estate recovery programs. 42 U.S.C. 1396p(b). “The term ‘estate recovery’ refers to the provisions of federal law requiring states to attempt to recover payments made to healthcare providers on behalf of a Medicaid recipient from the recipient's estate after his or her death.” Swanberg & Steward, Medicaid Estate Recovery Update: What You Need to Know Now, 93 Mich. B J 28, 28 (May 2014). In 2007, the Michigan Legislature passed 2007 PA 74, which added MCL 400.112g though MCL 400.112k to Michigan's Social Welfare Act, MCL 400.1 et seq. This legislation empowered defendant to “ establish and operate the Michigan medicaid estate recovery program to comply with” 42 U.S.C. 1396p.
MCL 400.112g(1). MCL 400.112g(5) required approval by the federal government before the estate recovery program would be implemented.
Specifically, MCL 400.112g(3) details what defendant had to seek federal approval for when it comes to a hardship exemption:
The current state plan, approved by the federal government, provides the following regarding the definition of undue hardship:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Deng, Docket No. 328826.
...the DCH merged with the Department of Human Services (DHS) and is now known as the DHHS. Ketchum Estate v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 314 Mich.App 485, 488 n. 1, 887 N.W.2d 226 (2016), citing Executive Order No.2015–4. The authority and responsibilities of the DCH and the DHS were tran......
-
Hegadorn v. Dep't of Human Servs. Dir., Docket No. 156132
...care that is funded and administered jointly by the federal government and individual states. Ketchum Estate v. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs. , 314 Mich. App. 485, 488, 887 N.W.2d 226 (2016). At the federal level, the program is administered by the Secretary of Health and Human Services th......
-
Cavill v. State
... ... Dep't ... of Health & Human Servs , Opinion and Order of the ... Court of Claims, issued December 30, 2020 (Docket No ... 20-000202-MK). The court rejected ... See generally, In re Estate of Klein , ... 316 Mich.App. 329, 337; 891 ... "); see also ... Ketchum Estate v Dep't of Health & Human ... Servs ... Gladson v Dept of Health and Human Servs , ... unpublished ... ...
-
Hegadorn v. Dep't of Human Servs. Dir.
...governments for a portion of the costs to provide medical assistance to low-income individuals." Ketchum Estate v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 314 Mich. App. 485, 488, 887 N.W.2d 226 (2016) (citation and quotation marks omitted). "Participation in Medicaid is essentially need-based...."......