Ketner v. Dillingham

Decision Date05 November 1897
Citation6 Kan.App. 921,50 P. 1098
PartiesKETNER v. DILLINGHAM.
CourtKansas Court of Appeals

Error from district court, Graham county.

Action by H. A. Ketner against William L. Dillingham. From the judgment, Ketner brings error. Dismissed.

F. D. Turck, for plaintiff in error.

Z. C. Tritt and H. J. Harwi, for defendant in error.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The petition in error does not show in what case or court the judgment complained of was rendered. The petition in error does not show what court tried the case and committed the alleged error. The transcript does not show when the pleadings were filed, nor when the judgment complained of was rendered. The petition in error in this case is not sufficient to present any question of law in this court.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Farmers' State Bank of Granite v. City State Bank of Mangum
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • 12 May 1914
    ...order is not set forth in the petition in error with reasonable certainty, the same is insufficient. ¶4 In the case of Ketner v. Dillingham, 6 Kan. App. 921, 50 P. 1098, the court held under a similar statute: "Where the petition in error does not show in what case or court the judgment was......
  • Farmers' State Bank of Granite v. City State Bank of Mangum
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • 12 May 1914
    ... ... error with reasonable certainty, the same is insufficient ...          In the ... case of Ketner v. Dillingham, 50 P. 1098, ... the court held under a similar statute: ... "Where the petition in error does not show in what case ... or court ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT