Killam v. Tenney
Jurisdiction | Oregon |
Parties | Graham KILLAM, dba Graham Killam Co., Respondent, v. G. U. TENNEY, dba West Coast Pictures, Appellant. |
Citation | 366 P.2d 739,229 Or. 134 |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Decision Date | 22 November 1961 |
Denton G. Burdick, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Hutchinson, Schwab & Burdick, Portland.
Mark A. Hathaway, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Hathaway & Arnold, Portland.
Before McALLISTER, C. J., and ROSSMAN, WARNER, PERRY, and LUSK, JJ.
This is an action to recover a real estate broker's commission. In a trial before the court without a jury the court entered a judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000 as an agreed commission and $1,750 attorneys' fee. Defendant appeals.
The plaintiff Graham Killam, dba Graham Killam Co., is a licensed real estate broker in the city of Portland, Oregon. The defendant G. U. Tenney, dba West Coast Pictures, was the owner of real property in Portland improved by a building in which the business referred to was conducted. On December 9, 1958, the defendant signed a listing agreement by which he gave the plaintiff
'* * * the sole and exclusive right to sell, exchange, or lease the property hereinafter described, at the price and terms hereinafter specified, or at such lesser price and upon such terms as the Owner may hereafter accept for a period of sixty (60) days from the date hereof, and continuing thereafter as a nonexclusive right to sell, exchange or lease for a like period of time unless terminated by a ten day notice in writing.'
Other material parts of the listing agreement are the following:
'The owner agrees to accept the following prices:
'2. $62,000.00 for the machinery, furniture, fixtures, name and good will.
'The owner agrees to accept $70,000.00 down payment on entire transaction with the balance of the payments due in 180 monthly installments including interest at the rate of six (6) per cent per annum.
'For performing the above services for the seller, either for the sale or lease of the real property and for the sale of personal property and inventory, the owner agrees to pay Graham Killam Co. a fee of $20,000.00.
* * *
* * *
* * *'
A salesman employed by the plaintiff introduced Mr. Carter Stanley as a prospective purchaser to the defendant and as a result of direct negotiations between the defendant and Stanley, the defendant gave to the latter on January 13, 1959, the following option agreement:
'Portland, Oregon
January 13, 1959
'Option Agreement
'For $10.00 (ten dollars) in hand received and other good and valuable consideration, G. U. Tenney, dba West Coast Pictures, 4321 N. E. Cully Blvd., hereby gives to Carter Stanley and associates, with right of assignment to a corporation to be formed, this option, to exprie [sic] March 15, 1959, as follows:
'Down payment is not to exceed 29% of total of inventory and equipment values as above set forth, and balance to be paid in equal payments of 10% each year with ten annual interest payments of $875.00 (eight hundred seventy-five dollars) per year.
'G. U. Tenney
'Garnet R. Tenney
'Witness: Roy E. Thomas
'This option is given with the consideration tha[t] the real estate borker [sic] representing Mr. Tenney will accept a sales commission of not more than $10,000.00 (ten thousand dollars).'
Garnet R. Tenney is the wife of the defendant G. U. Tenney.
On February 16, 1959, Mr. Stanley informed the defendant and his wife orally that he was exercising the option. Getting 'no reaction' from the defendant, Mr. Stanley had his attorney, Mr. Donald J. Griswold, write the following letter addressed to the defendant and his wife under date of February 25, 1959:
'February 25, 1959
'Mr. and Mrs. G. U. Tenney
4321 N. E. Cully Blvd.
Portland, Oregon
'Dear Mr. and Mrs. Tenney:
'The purpose of this letter is to repeat and confirm the verbal exercise of the option dated January 13, 1959 of Carter Stanley, which verbal exercise was made on February 16, 1959.
'As you know this option includes the right to purchase the machinery, equipment and name of said business (which name is West Coast Pictures) for $50,000.00, and the inventory of said business as of the date this option is exercised, at 75% of cost or market whichever is lower. Mr. Stanley also exercises the right to lease your existing premises in accordance with the option agreement.
'If possible we would like to make arrangements to close this purchase prior to March 1, 1959, and to this end will look forward to hearing from you immediately in regard to the inventory valuation and other matters which must be resolved. You are also requested to name the escrow agent for purposes of the down payment, transfer of title, etc.
'Very truly yours,
'Donald J. Griswold
'Donald J. Griswold
'djg:w
'cc: Mr. Wilmot K. Royal, Attorney
Failing Building
Portland, Oregon
'Mr. Graham Killam
4400 N. E. Hancock
Portland, Oregon'
Following the mailing of the foregoing letter, a meeting was had between Mr. Griswold, his partner Mr. David D. Pattullo, and Mr. Royal, who was then attorney for the defendant. Thereafter, on March 5, 1959, Mr. Griswold wrote Mr. Royal the following letter:
'March 5, 1959
'Mr. Wilmot K. Royal, Attorney
Failing Building
Portland, Oregon
'Re: Tenney-Stanley Sale
'Dear Mr. Royal:
'Reference is made to the conference held in my office between yourself, Mr. Pattullo and this writer in regard to concluding the arrangements for the transfer of the business and assets of Mr. Tenney to Mr. Stanley pursuant to the option agreement entered into on January 13, 1959.
'In order to expedite this matter and in order to avoid question as to which party was to proceed, it was decided that I would write you a letter setting forth our conclusions. If you disagree with any of my statements, please get in touch with me immediately so that we may iron out any differences.
'You pointed out the fact that your client was in Grants Pass and you did not know when he would return and be available for consideration of the necessary matters. It will, of course, be necessary that Mr. Tenney himself or an agent appointed by him be available in order to resolve the inventory valuation and other matters which must be done. We urge that you impress upon Mr. Tenney, Mr. Stanley's desire to consummate this action as soon as possible. If Mr. Tenney is not physically able, perhaps there is someone else who has the know-how and whom he would trust to act as his agent.
'Below is a list of the items to be decided upon and, in some cases, an indication of our understanding of the disposition of these items:
'1. The first thing that should be done before we proceed further is to determine whether or not the broker. Mr. Graham Killam, will accept the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gyurkey v. Babler
...of notice can be demanded. Vozar v. Francis, 579 P.2d 1056 (Alaska 1978); Figge v. Clark, 174 N.W.2d 432 (Iowa 1970); Killam v. Tenney, 299 Cr. 134, 366 P.2d 739 (1961); Taylor v. Hartman, 370 Pa. 146, 87 A.2d 785 (1952). Oral notice of an intent to exercise an option has been held to be su......
- McLaughlin v. Rova Farms, Inc.
-
Roth Development, Inc. v. A. R. John General Contractors, Inc.
...in the result. 1 Plaintiff cites Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co., 99 Or. 58, 91, 190 P. 331, 195 P. 163, 167 (1921); Killam v. Tenney, 229 Or. 134, 149, 366 P.2d 739 (1961); Prince v. Dierks, 244 Or. 145, 416 P.2d 318 (1966); and Williams v. Barbee, 165 Or. 260, 106 P.2d 1033 (1940).Rorvik ......
-
Loose v. Brubacher
...311, 390 P.2d 313; Kottler v. Martin, 241 N.C. 369, 85 S.E.2d 314; Catsman v. Eister, 8 Mich.App. 563, 155 N.W.2d 203; Killam v. Tenney, 229 Or. 134, 366 P.2d 739; Duprey v. Donahoe,52 Wash.2d 129, 323 P.2d It has been said that courts are likely to interpret the agreement in such a way tha......