Kim, et al. v. Dome Entertainment Center, Inc.
| Docket Number | 10-10882 |
| Decision Date | 09 April 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
24 cases
-
Wiggains v. Reed (In re Wiggains)
...homestead exemption would be capped at $130,675.5 Moreover, we know from the Fifth Circuit's opinion in Kim v. Dome Entertainment Center, Inc. (In re Kim), 748 F.3d 647 (5th Cir. 2014) that, while spouses who choose to file bankruptcy jointly are entitled to double their homestead exemption......
-
United Mine Workers of Am. Combined Benefit Fund v. Walter Energy, Inc.
...interest or claims that could be brought against the bankrupt estate during a bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C. § 363(f) ; see In re Odes Ho Kim , 748 F.3d 647, 654–55 (5th Cir.2014) ; Al Perry Enterprises, Inc. v. Appalachian Fuels, LLC , 503 F.3d 538, 543 (6th Cir.2007). Appellants argue that the ter......
-
Wiggains v. Reed (In re Wiggains)
...homestead exemption would be capped at $130,675.6 Moreover, we know from the Fifth Circuit's opinion in Kim v. Dome Entertainment Center, Inc. (In re Kim), 748 F.3d 647 (5th Cir. 2014) that, while spouses who choose to file bankruptcy jointly are entitled to double their homestead exemption......
-
Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC
...of issue on appeal). Our sister circuits are in accord on the effects of similar high-low settlement agreements. See In re Odes Ho Kim , 748 F.3d 647, 652 (5th Cir. 2014) (holding dispute not moot where value of promissory note would be "adjusted" based on resolution of appeal); United Stat......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The Housing Bubble and Consumer Bankruptcy (Parts I and II).
...(In re Reed), 940 F.2d 1317, 1322 (9th Cir. 1991). (32) [section] 363(f)(3). (33) See Kim v. Dome Entertainment Ctr., Inc. (In re Kim), 748 F.3d 647 (5th Cir. 2014) (sale to access cash surplus over the monetary exemption); Hyman v. Plotkin (In re Hyman), 967 F.2d 1316 (9th Cir. 1992). In I......
