Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp.

Docket NumberB247672
Decision Date19 January 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Hairu Chen v. L.A. Truck Ctrs., LLC
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 18 Enero 2017
    ...case presenting the issue of whether industry custom evidence is admissible in a risk-benefit case. (Kim et al. v. Toyota Motor Corporation (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1366, 197 Cal.Rptr.3d 647, review granted April 13, 2016, S232754.) Moreover, even if the evidence were admitted, we do not find......
  • Renninger v. A&R Mach. Shop & Cass Hudson Co.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • 11 Abril 2017
    ...is still in controversy in California, and the issue is currently pending before the California Supreme Court. Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp., 197 Cal.Rptr.3d 647 (App. 2016), review granted and opinion superseded , 200 Cal.Rptr.3d 763, 368 P.3d 311 (2016).In Kim, the plaintiffs filed a motion i......
  • Mercurio v. Louisville Ladder, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • 17 Abril 2019
    ...26, 2014, 148 A.3d at 476, and Tincher was decided on November 19, 2014, 104 A.3d 328. 8. Renninger pointed to Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp., 197 Cal. Rptr. 3d 647 (App. 2016), review granted and opinion superseded, 200 Cal. Rptr. 3d 768, 368 P.3d 311 (2016), as illustrative of the competing ar......
  • People v. Vargas
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 19 Enero 2016
  • Get Started for Free