KIMBELL MILLING COMPANY v. THE WARREN COMPANY, INC.
| Decision Date | 04 March 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 19362.,19362. |
| Citation | 406 F.2d 775 |
| Parties | KIMBELL MILLING COMPANY and Buddies Super Markets, Appellants, v. The WARREN COMPANY, Inc., and Joe C. Neel and Rufus Neel, d/b/a Food Center, and Neel's Food Center, Inc., Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Richard H. Mays, of Crumpler, O'Connor, Wynne & Mays, El Dorado, Ark., for appellants.
Gene Matthews, Jr., of Wootton, Land & Matthews, Hot Springs, Ark., for appellees.
Before GIBSON, LAY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.
This is a diversity case concerned with the right of a foreign corporation to rescind an executed contract for sale of equipment and related issues. After reading and considering the record and the briefs filed, we affirm the judgment of the District Court on the basis of the well considered and well reasoned opinion of the Honorable John E. Miller reported at 284 F.Supp. 203 (W.D.Ark. 1968).
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Senior Accountants, Analysts and Appraisers Ass'n v. City of Detroit
...Porter v. Nossen, 360 F.Supp. 527, 530--531 (M.D.Pa., 1973); Warren Co. v. Neel, 284 F.Supp. 203, 212--213 (W.D.Ark., 1968), Aff'd 406 F.2d 775 (CA8, 1969); 5A Corbin, Contracts, § 1225, pp. 492--498. See also Holcolm v. Bullock, 353 Mich. 514, 519, 91 N.W.2d 869 (1958). Cf. Carr v. Kalamaz......
-
McCarney v. Ford Motor Co.
...19 (8th Cir. 1981); Warren Co. v. Neel, 284 F.Supp. 203, 210-11 (W.D.Ark.1968), aff'd per curiam sub nom. Kimbell Milling Co. v. Warren Co., Inc., 406 F.2d 775 (8th Cir. 1969). Although none of these cases is directly on point, a consistent thread runs through them. The justiciability doctr......
-
Grubb v. Cloven, CA
...as in Shamburger, the principle is the same. See also, Warren Co. v. Neel, 284 F.Supp. 203 (W.D.Ark.1968), aff'd as Kimbell Milling v. Warren Co., 406 F.2d 775 (CA8, 1968), where the result differed but the question was again deemed one of The appellant has simply misconceived the issue as ......
-
C. B. Intern., Inc. v. Cook, 81-1079
...Inc., 232 Ark. 354, 335 S.W.2d 813 (1960) and Warren Company v. Neel, 284 F.Supp. 203 (W.D.Ark.1968) (aff'd, Kimbell Milling Co. v. Warren Co., 406 F.2d 775 (8th Cir. 1969)). See also, Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Cranco, 578 S.W.2d 229, 231 (Ark.1979). We agree that although C. B. International......