Kimble v. Bunny

• Decision Date: 07 April 1900
• Docket Number: 11,402
• Parties: HENRY KIMBLE v. FREDERICK BUNNY
• Court: Kansas Supreme Court

60 P. 746

61 Kan. 665

HENRY KIMBLE v. FREDERICK BUNNY

No. 11,402

Supreme Court of Kansas

April 7, 1900

Decided January, 1900.

Error from Saline district court; R. F. THOMPSON, judge.

Judgment affirmed.

David Ritchie, for plaintiff in error.

Burch & Burch, for defendant in error.

OPINION

SMITH J.:

The plaintiff below, Frederick Bunny, brought an action against Henry Kimble based on three promissory notes alleged to have been executed by the latter. The defendant answered by filing a general denial, with a verification, as follows:

"Comes now the said defendant, Henry Kimble, and for his answer to the plaintiff's petition herein denies each and every allegation therein contained."

"State of Illinois, County of Grundy, ss.

"Henry Kimble, being of lawful age and being first duly sworn deposes and says: That he is acquainted with the facts set forth in the above and foregoing answer, and that the facts therein stated are true. So help me God.

HENRY [his mark X] KIMBLE.

"Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30th day of August, 1897.

JOHN BARTON, Notary Public."

(SEAL.)

If no denial of the execution of the notes sued on was made by this answer so verified, then the errors complained of which relate to the rejection of testimony offered by the defendant below become immaterial. By the provisions of our statute, allegations of the execution of written instruments and indorsements thereon are taken as true in all actions, unless a denial of the same be verified by the affidavit of the party, his agent or attorney. (Gen. Stat. 1897, ch. 95, § 108; Gen. Stat. 1899, § 4358.) Section 111 of the code reads:

"The affidavit shall be sufficient if it state that the affiant believes the facts stated in the pleading to be true."

This answer contains no statement of facts, and the verification subjoined to it is appropriate to that required to be attached to a pleading which avers facts affirmatively. If the answer had contained a specific denial that the defendant below had executed the notes, copies of which were set forth in the petition, then the verification would have been sufficient. In such case an affirmative statement would have appeared, to which the language of the affidavit attached to the answer would have been applicable. In a general denial there are no facts stated. The pleading contains denials, but the verification employed in this case contains no statement that...