Kimbrough v. United States
| Decision Date | 01 October 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 06–11783.,06–11783. |
| Citation | 128 S.Ct. 154,552 U.S. 864,76 USLW 3160,169 L.Ed.2d 106 |
| Parties | Damon KIMBROUGH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Case below, 477 F.3d 144.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
U.S. v. Murphy
...in the light most favorable to the government. United States v. Kimbrough, 477 F.3d 144, 147 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 154, 169 L.Ed.2d 106 (2007). We review the district court's factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. Id. III. Murphy firs......
-
United States v. Ingram, : 5:12-CR-00020-BR
... ... United States v. Patane, 542 U.S. 630, 642 (2004) (plurality). Thus, the violation of Miranda does not require the suppression of any physical evidence obtained as a result of defendant's statements to Officer Briggs. See United States v. Kimbrough, 477 F.3d 144, 145 n.1 (4th Cir.) (relying in part on Patane to recognize that "physical evidence discovered as a result of a Miranda violation is admissible"), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 864 (2007).Page 4As for the government's contention that defendant's statements are admissible on cross-examination ... ...