Kind v. Barone

CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
Citation12 A.D.2d 625,208 N.Y.S.2d 147
Decision Date05 December 1960
PartiesElaine KIND, Joseph Piccinonno, Vincent Amato and Leo's Service Station, Respondents, v. Anthony BARONE and Mary Acampora, Appellants.

Page 147

208 N.Y.S.2d 147
12 A.D.2d 625
Elaine KIND, Joseph Piccinonno, Vincent Amato and Leo's
Service Station, Respondents,
v.
Anthony BARONE and Mary Acampora, Appellants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
Dec. 5, 1960.

Galli, Terhune, Gibbons & Mulvehill, New York City, for appellants; Patrick E. Gibbons, New York City, of counsel.

Santo R. Sgarlato, Jr., Brooklyn, for respondents; Frank A. Teti, New York City, of counsel.

Before NOLAN, P. J., and BELDOCK, UGHETTA, KLEINFELD and CHRIST, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property resulting from a rear-end collision when defendants' automobile struck

Page 148

plaintiffs' automobile while it was stopped at a red traffic signal, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 20, 1960, granting plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment striking out defendants' [12 A.D.2d 626] answer and directing an assessment of damages.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

In our opinion, the record presents issues of fact which should be resolved after trial.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • Andre v. Pomeroy
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • November 21, 1974
    ...428; Colosino v. Rosenstock, 15 A.D.2d 663, 223 N.Y.S.2d 736; Poulter v. Masullo, 13 A.D.2d 674, 213 N.Y.S.2d 548; Kind v. Barone, 12 A.D.2d 625, 208 N.Y.S.2d 147; Block v. Acerra, 12 A.D.2d 525, 207 N.Y.S.2d 845; see, a fortiori, Small v. Tyres, 33 A.D.2d 1055, 308 [320 N.E.2d 856] N.Y.S.2......
  • Storfer v. Fogel
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • October 5, 1964
    ...Order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the record presents issues of fact which should be resolved after a trial (Kind v. Barone, 12 A.D.2d 625, 208 N.Y.S.2d 147; Hilton v. Feinerman, 11 A.D.2d 1027, 207 N.Y.S.2d BELDOCK, P. J., and KLEINFELD, CHRIST, HILL and RABIN, JJ., concur. ...
2 cases
  • Andre v. Pomeroy
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • November 21, 1974
    ...428; Colosino v. Rosenstock, 15 A.D.2d 663, 223 N.Y.S.2d 736; Poulter v. Masullo, 13 A.D.2d 674, 213 N.Y.S.2d 548; Kind v. Barone, 12 A.D.2d 625, 208 N.Y.S.2d 147; Block v. Acerra, 12 A.D.2d 525, 207 N.Y.S.2d 845; see, a fortiori, Small v. Tyres, 33 A.D.2d 1055, 308 [320 N.E.2d 856] N.Y.S.2......
  • Storfer v. Fogel
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • October 5, 1964
    ...Order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the record presents issues of fact which should be resolved after a trial (Kind v. Barone, 12 A.D.2d 625, 208 N.Y.S.2d 147; Hilton v. Feinerman, 11 A.D.2d 1027, 207 N.Y.S.2d BELDOCK, P. J., and KLEINFELD, CHRIST, HILL and RABIN, JJ., concur. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT