Kindred v. State, 369S45

Decision Date08 May 1970
Docket NumberNo. 369S45,369S45
PartiesJames KINDRED, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

Ralph M. Foley, Foley & Foley, Martinsville, for appellant.

Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, William F. Thompson, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.

GIVAN, Judge.

Appellant was charged by affidavit with the crime of uttering a forged instrument. Upon a plea of not guilty, trial was had by court. The appellant was found guilty as charged and was sentenced to the Indiana State Reformatory for a period of not less than two nor more than 14 years and fined $50 and costs.

The evidence in the case discloses that Joan Kindred, appellant's estranged wife, wrote a check on March 15, 1968, in the amount of $72 purportedly payable to one John Lawson and purportedly drawn by one Stephen Ferran upon the Indiana Bank & Trust Company of Martinsville, Indiana. She testified that she gave the check to the appellant. Appellant's wife testified that she only did the writing on the front of the check and had no knowledge of the writing on the back.

A Bill Collier testified that he was the manager of the Martinsville IGA Foodliner and identified the check in question as one which was cashed in their store, and that it was run through a 'regiscope,' which takes a picture of the check and also of the person cashing the check. State's Exhibit 1 was identified and placed in evidence as the check in question. State's Exhibit 2 was identified as the picture taken in the IGA Store supposedly at the time the check was cashed. However, an objection by the defendant to the admission of this Exhibit was sustained by the court for the reason that the manager could not state who operated the machine at the time the picture was taken, or the date the picture was taken. He further testified that he did not know who presented the check for payment.

One Herschel Lane, a cab driver in Martinsville, testified that on the 29th day of March, 1968, he hauled the defendant to the IGA Store in Martinsville. The defendant entered the store, returned shortly without any groceries, was returned by the cab driver to his home, where the driver was paid by the appellant with a $10 bill.

The above constitutes all of the evidence which in any way tended to connect the appellant with the alleged crime. The State without question established by the testimony of Mrs. Kindred that the instrument was forged. The State also established that the check was given to James Kindred. However, there is no evidence that it was James Kindred who presented the check at the IGA Store. All we know from the testimony of the manager is that someone presented the check on an undetermined date to an undetermined cashier. We also know from the evidence that fourteen days after the date appearing on the check the appellant was taken to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Kindred v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 28, 1989
    ...168; Kindred v. State (1974), 160 Ind.App. 418, 312 N.E.2d 100; Kindred v. State (1970), 254 Ind. 127, 258 N.E.2d 411; Kindred v. State (1970), 254 Ind. 105, 258 N.E.2d 53; Kindred v. State (1970), 254 Ind. 73, 257 N.E.2d 667.2 During the criminal trial which resulted in the defendant's con......
  • Kindred v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 8, 1988
    ...776; Kindred v. State (1974), 160 Ind.App. 418, 312 N.E.2d 100; Kindred v. State (1970), 254 Ind. 127, 258 N.E.2d 411; Kindred v. State (1970), 254 Ind. 105, 258 N.E.2d 53; Kindred v. State (1970), 254 Ind. 73, 257 N.E.2d The record shows defendant to be literate, competent and fully aware ......
  • Kindred v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • December 12, 1996
    ...Kindred v. State, 160 Ind.App. 418, 312 N.E.2d 100 (1974); Kindred v. State, 254 Ind. 127, 258 N.E.2d 411 (1970); Kindred v. State, 254 Ind. 105, 258 N.E.2d 53 (1970); Kindred v. State, 254 Ind. 73, 257 N.E.2d 667 (1970).10 For example, Kindred raised forty-seven issues in his direct appeal......
  • Payne v. State, 669S136
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • May 8, 1970

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT