King v. Blankenship, No. 78-6184
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before WINTER, Circuit Judge, FIELD, Senior Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS; WINTER |
| Citation | 636 F.2d 70 |
| Parties | Emmitt G. KING, Appellant, v. W. D. BLANKENSHIP, Superintendent; Louise D. Hall, Magistrate; James E.Johnson, Treatment Supr.; S. L. Townley, Captain of Guards, Appellees. |
| Decision Date | 05 December 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 78-6184 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
71 practice notes
-
Fisher v. Koehler, No. 83 Civ. 2128 (MEL).
...standard in determining whether the Eighth Amendment rights of convicted prisoners have been violated. See, e.g., King v. Blankenship, 636 F.2d 70, 73 (4th Cir.1980); Furtado v. Bishop, 604 F.2d 80, 95 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035, 100 S.Ct. 710, 62 L.Ed.2d 672 58 Although, a......
-
Meyers v. Montgomery County Police Dept., No. 1190
...proscribed by state law rises to the level of a constitutional violation so as to support a section 1983 action"); King v. Blankenship, 636 F.2d 70, 73 (4th Cir.1980) ("not every instance of the use of excessive force gives rise to a cause of action under § 1983 merely because it gives rise......
-
Blair v. Austin, No. 35, Sept. Term, 2019
...see Fillmore v. Page, 358 F.3d 496, 504 (7th Cir. 2004) ; Baldwin v. Stalder, 137 F.3d 836, 839 (5th Cir. 1998) ; King v. Blankenship, 636 F.2d 70, 71 (4th Cir. 1980), and that the circuit court was correct in denying the motion for judgment1 of Officer 469 Md. 30 Austin, given that the Est......
-
Albers v. Whitley, Civ. A. No. 81-517-PA.
...The unjustified striking, beating, or infliction of bodily harm upon a prisoner gives rise to liability under § 1983. King v. Blankenship, 636 F.2d 70, 72 (4th Cir. 1980). The eighth amendment, applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment, prohibits the infliction of cruel and ......
Request a trial to view additional results
71 cases
-
Spell v. McDaniel, No. 84-06-CIV-3.
...the Fourth and Eighth Amendments which give rise to the right of physical integrity for pretrial detainees. See King v. Blankenship, 636 F.2d 70 (4th Cir.1980); Loe v. Armistead, 582 F.2d 1291 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied sub nom. Moffitt v. Loe, 446 U.S. 928, 100 S.Ct. 1865, 64 L.Ed.2d 281......
-
Fisher v. Koehler, No. 83 Civ. 2128 (MEL).
...standard in determining whether the Eighth Amendment rights of convicted prisoners have been violated. See, e.g., King v. Blankenship, 636 F.2d 70, 73 (4th Cir.1980); Furtado v. Bishop, 604 F.2d 80, 95 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035, 100 S.Ct. 710, 62 L.Ed.2d 672 58 Although, a......
-
Meyers v. Montgomery County Police Dept., No. 1190
...proscribed by state law rises to the level of a constitutional violation so as to support a section 1983 action"); King v. Blankenship, 636 F.2d 70, 73 (4th Cir.1980) ("not every instance of the use of excessive force gives rise to a cause of action under § 1983 merely because it gives rise......
-
Blair v. Austin, No. 35, Sept. Term, 2019
...see Fillmore v. Page, 358 F.3d 496, 504 (7th Cir. 2004) ; Baldwin v. Stalder, 137 F.3d 836, 839 (5th Cir. 1998) ; King v. Blankenship, 636 F.2d 70, 71 (4th Cir. 1980), and that the circuit court was correct in denying the motion for judgment1 of Officer 469 Md. 30 Austin, given that the Est......
Request a trial to view additional results