King v. Gibbs

Decision Date17 December 1914
Docket Number807
Citation12 Ala.App. 504,67 So. 757
PartiesKING et al. v. GIBBS.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cullman County; D.W. Speake, Judge.

Action by John Gibbs against W.L. King and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed and rendered.

Brown & Griffith, of Cullman, for appellants.

W.E James, of Cullman, for appellee.

PELHAM P.J.

The form of action brought in the trial court by the appellee against the appellants was ex contractu, on a joint and several obligation (a promissory note). The record shows that the plaintiff dismissed his suit in the trial court as to the joint defendant G.B. King, and took judgment by default against the other defendants to the cause of action. It is the insistence of the appellants that the plaintiff in the court below by dismissing his suit as to the defendant G.B King, who the record shows had been served with process discontinued his cause of action and rendered the trial court without jurisdiction to render judgment against the other defendants to the cause of action, who bring this appeal.

The effect of the discontinuance as to one of the several defendants on the joint, or joint and several cause of action, was to discontinue the case and put the parties out of court and leave the court without jurisdiction to proceed to a hearing of the case and rendition of judgment. Evans Marble Co. v. McDonald & Co., 142 Ala. 130, 37 So. 830; Curtis et al. v. Gaines, Adm'r, 46 Ala. 455; Beecher v. Henderson, 4 Ala.App. 543, 58 So. 805.

The point made by the appellee that the record fails to show that the defendant G.B. King had been served, because of a failure to show a compliance with the provisions of section 5300 of the Code of 1907, is without merit. The branch writ issued was not only an exact counterpart of the original writ, but is shown by the record to have been issued in this case in pursuance of an order of the court at the instance and on the motion of the plaintiff. The purpose of the statute (Code, § 5300) is to preserve the identity of the cause of action as to the original and branch summons. This identity was established by the order of the court made in this case at the instance of the plaintiff, and, besides, any variance or other irregularity militating against the identity of the branch writ could only be taken advantage of by the party served, unless the record affirmatively disclosed a...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT