King v. Hill & Shaffer Co.
Decision Date | 16 December 1909 |
Citation | 163 Ala. 422,51 So. 15 |
Parties | KING v. HILL & SHAFFER CO. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Tallapoosa County; B. M. Miller, Judge.
Action by Hill & Shaffer Company against W. H. Coker for certain personal property, in which suit Basil King intervened, claiming the property. From a judgment for plaintiff, claimant appeals. Affirmed.
J. W. Strother, for appellant.
Lackey & Bridges, for appellee.
This cause is submitted on motion to strike bill of exceptions and upon its merits.
Section 3019 of the Code of 1907 provides as follows:
It affirmatively appears that the bill was not presented within the time required by statute, as to either the main trial or the motion for a new trial, and it must therefore be stricken on appellee's motion. The judge had no right to receive it after the time for presenting had expired. The statute is explicit that it must be presented within 90 days, "and not afterwards."
The bill of exceptions being stricken, the record proper shows no reversible error, and hence the judgment must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Leeth v. Kornman, Sawyer & Co.
...L. M. Co. v. Canterbury, 169 Ala. 444, 53 So. 823; Baker v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 165 Ala. 466, 51 So. 796; King v. Hill & Shafer, 163 Ala. 422, 51 So. 15; Rainey v. Ridgeway, 151 Ala. 532, 43 So. An. Elec. & Gas Co. v. Cooper, 136 Ala. 418, 34 So. 931; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Malone, 116 Al......
-
Thacker v. City of Selma
...as prescribed by the statute. Petty v. Dill, 53 Ala. 641; Edinburgh L. & M. Co. v. Canterbury, 169 Ala. 444, 53 So. 823; King v. Hill, 163 Ala. 423, 51 So. 15; Smith v. State, 166 Ala. 26, So. 396; Rainey v. Ridgeway, 151 Ala. 532, 43 So. 843; Leeth v. Kornman, Sawyer & Co., 2 Ala.App. 311,......
-
National Pyrites & Copper Co. v. Williams
... ... Petty v. Dill, ... 53 Ala. 641; Edinburgh Co. v. Canterbury, 169 Ala ... 444, 53 So. 823; King v. Hill, 163 Ala. 423, 51 So ... 15; Smith v. State, 166 Ala. 24, 52 So. 396; ... Rainey v ... ...
-
McMillon v. Skelton
...judge within 90 days after the judgment, and cannot therefore be looked to in passing upon the rulings on the main trial. King v. Hill, 163 Ala. 422, 51 So. 15. It is that, though a bill of exceptions may not be signed or presented in time to review the original judgment in a cause, yet, if......