King v. Kramer

Decision Date25 May 2012
Docket NumberNo. 11–2204.,11–2204.
Citation680 F.3d 1013
PartiesLisa KING, as Special Administrator for the Estate of John P. King, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Sue KRAMER, Karen Mondry–Anderson, William J. Olson, Jennifer Koby–Gobel and La Crosse County, Wisconsin, Defendants–Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Michael. J. Devanie (argued), Attorney, Devanie, Belzer & Schroeder, La Crosse, WI, for PlaintiffAppellant.

W. Patrick Sullivan (argued), Attorney, Siesennop & Sullivan, Amy J. Doyle (argued), Crivello Carlson, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for DefendantsAppellees.

Before BAUER, POSNER, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.

WOOD, Circuit Judge.

John P. King died while incarcerated at the infirmary in the jail operated by La Crosse County, Wisconsin. King's widow, Lisa King, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against five defendants: Officer William Olson, Officer Jennifer Koby–Gobel, Nurse Sue Kramer, Nurse Karen Mondry–Anderson, and La Crosse County. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm in part and reverse in part the district court's grant of the defendants' motion for summary judgment.

I

Our account of the facts proceeds, as it must, in the light most favorable to King; as usual, we are not vouching for anything. Righi v. SMC Corp., 632 F.3d 404, 408 (7th Cir.2011). On April 7, 2007, King was booked at the La Crosse County Jail to await trial. The County contracts with a private company, Health Professionals Ltd. (HPL), to provide medical care for the inmates. The 2007 contract makes HPL responsible for providing a physician to attend weekly sick call “for an estimated minimum of one hour and an estimated maximum of three hours except as is medically necessary.” Dr. Erickson was the physician under contract with HPL to conduct on-site visits for at least two and no more than four hours a week; he typically came on Tuesdays. No other physician was physically present at the jail during the week. The contract also gave HPL the authority to develop a preferred drug list, the so-called formulary.

King suffered from serious medical problems, including severe anxiety, at the time of his incarceration. His doctor at the Tomah Veterans Hospital had prescribed for him a daily regimen of medications that included five milligrams of alprazolam, a benzodiazepine. King brought with him to the jail two grocery bags full of his medications, including a bottle with 115 one-milligram tablets of alprazolam. Nurse Karen Mondry–Anderson conducted his initial health screening. King told her that he had asthma, diabetes, a heart problem, high blood pressure, seizures, and mental health problems. He also said that he had mental health issues that would require attention while he was at the jail.

Mondry–Anderson contacted the on-call physician, Dr. Stephen Cullinan, who was based nearly 300 miles away in Peoria, Illinois. She informed him that King had a large bottle of alprazolam in his possession, but that she was not certain of his prescribed daily dosage. Obviously unable to examine King, and not bothering to obtain the details about the VA prescription, Dr. Cullinan nevertheless scheduled him to be weaned off the alprazolam, a drug excluded from HPL's formulary, over a three-day period. This was a dangerously rapid reduction given King's existing prescription. Dr. Cullinan ordered King to be switched to a beta blocker, Inderal, that was on HPL's formulary, rather than another benzodiazepine. Beta blockers may be used off-label to treat performance anxiety. They are often helpful to performers and public speakers because they block the physical symptoms of anxiety, notably tremors and shortness of breath. Dr. Brian Brennan, What Are Beta Blockers, How Do They Work, and How Are Beta Blockers Used in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders? ABC NEWS, http:// abcnews. go. com/ Health/ Anxiety Treating/ story? id= 4664801 (last visited May 22, 2012). They do little to reduce the feeling of anxiety, and are not recommended for patients with heart conditions or asthma. Lundbeck Institute, Anxiety Disorders, http:// www. brainexplorer. org/ anxiety/ Anxiety_ Treatment. shtml (last visited May 22, 2012). Given that King was not seeking short-term performance anxiety relief and that he did suffer from a heart problem and asthma, it is not clear why Inderal was chosen for him. The jail medical staff failed to give King any alprazolam on his first day. On the second and third days, he received two doses, and he received one final dose on the fourth day, April 10.

Abrupt withdrawal from alprazolam can be life-threatening. Associated symptoms include agitation, elevated blood pressure, elevated pulse, tremors, delusions, hallucinations, and seizures. The severity of such symptoms requires medical providers to monitor the patient closely, preferably in a hospital. No member of the jail's medical staff prepared a plan to monitor King's withdrawal.

King was housed in Receiving Cell C with four other inmates: Michael Kleiber, John Gerke, Jesse Reid, and Clinton Stevens. King's health appeared to deteriorate in the days following his arrival at the jail. His shaking became more severe, and he became less and less coherent. King told Kleiber that he had been given a replacement medication that made him feel shaky and caused him to hallucinate.

On April 10, Nurse Deb Baker faxed a medical release to Tomah Veterans Hospital for a complete list of King's prescriptions. The Hospital provided the jail with the requested information later that day. The documentation stated that King was prescribed five milligrams of alprazolam daily. The list of medications was placed in King's medical file, where it remained available for the physician at his weekly on-site visit.

King submitted a health request the following day indicating that he wanted to be seen by a physician. He stated that he had not slept in at least 96 hours, among other concerns. He complained to jail staff that he was suffering from side effects of the medication, but they informed him that he needed to wait for the doctor. Again on April 13, King requested health care and was informed that he would meet with a physician at the next available appointment. He was seen by a social worker on April 13, who noted that King appeared anxious and was perspiring. King was not finally seen by a physician until April 17, ten days after he was admitted to the jail. The physician, Dr. Erickson, noted that King had pressured speech and flights of ideas with manic insomnia.

The critical events forming the basis of this action took place on April 18. In the morning, Officers Brian Olson and Jennifer Koby–Gobel conducted a cell check and saw King lying in his bed. He made eye contact with Olson and then closed his eyes and twitched his arm. At approximately 10:30 a.m., Gerke, one of King's cellmates, called for help. Olson and Koby–Gobel found King convulsing on the floor, screaming and foaming at the mouth. They called for a nurse.

Nurse Sue Kramer, the site director, was with three nursing students at the time and responded to the call. On their way to King's cell, Kramer told the nursing students that inmates fake seizures. When Kramer arrived, she tried to put a pulse oximeter on King's toe, but his shaking was too intense to keep it on. Olson told King to “quit acting like a child and get up” and accused him of faking the seizure. Kramer was unable to get a blood pressure reading because King was shaking too hard. She then used smelling salts to look for a reaction, but there was none. Failure to respond to smelling salts is consistent with seizures. King's face turned blue. Kramer and the officers, convinced that King was faking, left King lying on the floor. They did not contact the on-call physician, Dr. Cullinan, or emergency medical services.

An hour later, Stevens, another cellmate, called out for help because King was again convulsing. Kramer and the officers returned. Kramer again chose not to contact Dr. Cullinan or emergency medical services. Kramer was aware that King was being tapered off alprazolam and understood that alprazolam withdrawal can cause seizures, hallucination, and death. Interestingly, she ordered that the officers move him to a padded cell.

After King was moved, Kramer did nothing else. She did not have the authority to open the door of the padded cell. She testified that she wanted to take his vitals, but the officers were too busy to let her in. The nursing staff was able to observe King only on a small screen in the nurse's station, but the quality of the image was very poor. There was an intercom system in the cell, but it was very difficult to hear with the echo.

Kramer was relieved by Mondry–Anderson at around 5:00 p.m. Kramer informed her that King had faked a seizure earlier in the day. She said that King had responded to smelling salts by turning away from them. Mondry–Anderson was not particularly concerned about King's condition, given Kramer's misleading account of the day's events.

At around 5:30 that afternoon, King called the jailers on the intercom. Jailer Annie Corcoran was unable to understand him because of the echo in the cell. She spoke with him directly through the food slot 15 minutes later. He told her that it was fine for her to look around his cell. He then said that his cell door was locked, he could not get out, and that he was hearing voices. When Corcoran asked him what the voices said, he did not answer. He asked if he could use the toilet, and Corcoran instructed him to use the grate in the back of the cell.

At 6:00 p.m. Mondry–Anderson checked on King using the television monitor in the nurse's station. She could not see the image well, but she noted that King appeared to be lying on the floor and then was able to walk around seemingly without any difficulty. One of the jailers notified her that King had eaten about half of his dinner.

At 7:30 p.m., Mondry–Anderson went to give King his medication, but...

To continue reading

Request your trial
496 cases
  • Pindak v. Dart
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • August 27, 2015
    ...the problems caused by a jail's policies and the sheriff had publicly acknowledged his awareness of the troublesome policies. 680 F.3d 1013, 1021 (7th Cir.2012). Lacking such direct evidence of the Sheriff's knowledge in this case, Plaintiffs make two alternative arguments in support of Mon......
  • Hahn v. Walsh
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • September 9, 2014
    ...in their own care, because those circumstances were not presented in Morrissey's situation. We contrast this case with King v. Kramer, 680 F.3d 1013, 1021 (7th Cir.2012), where we held that summary judgment was inappropriate for a municipality where there was evidence that officials were on......
  • Pasadena Republican Club v. W. Justice Ctr.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • December 30, 2019
    ...1988) (emphasis added), abrogated on other grounds as stated in L.W. v. Grubbs , 92 F.3d 894, 898 (9th Cir. 1996). In King v. Kramer , 680 F.3d 1013, 1020 (7th Cir. 2012), and Ancata v. Prison Health Services, Inc. , 769 F.2d 700, 704-05 & n.9 (11th Cir. 1985), for example, the delegation d......
  • Donaldson v. John Baldwin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Illinois
    • February 8, 2017
    ...8 The Complaint indicates that Plaintiff suffers from seizures, an objectively serious medical condition. See King v. Kramer, 680 F.3d 1013, 1018 (7th Cir. 2012) ("Medical conditions much less serious than seizures have satisfied the standard."). On March 25, 2016, Plaintiff wrote a letter ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Prisoners' Rights
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal No. 110-Annual Review, August 2022
    • August 1, 2022
    ...Cir. 2014) (pretrial detainees enjoy same constitutional privacy guarantee during strip searches as convicted prisoners); King v. Kramer, 680 F.3d 1013, 1017 (7th Cir. 2012) (pretrial detainees enjoy at least as much protection under Due Process Clause as convicted prisoners enjoy under 8th......
  • Recent Legal Developments
    • United States
    • Sage Criminal Justice Review No. 38-2, June 2013
    • June 1, 2013
    ...Snitch. In M. D. McShane & F. D. Williams III (Eds.), Encyclopedia ofAmerican prisons (p. 449). New York, NY: Garland.King v. Kramer, 680 F.3d 1013 (7th Cir. 2012).Kirklin, J. T. (2011). Title VII protection for inmates: A model approach for safeguarding civil rights in Amer-ica’s prisons. ......
  • Part two: case summaries by major topic.
    • United States
    • Detention and Corrections Caselaw Quarterly No. 58, January 2014
    • January 1, 2014
    ...(Ernest Brooks Facility, Michigan, and Correctional Medical Services) U.S. Appeals Court DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE POLICIES King v. Kramer, 680 F.3d 1013 (7th Cir. 2012). The widow of a deceased pre-trial detainee brought a [section] 1983 action against a county, officers, and nurses, allegin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT