King v. Riverland Levee Dist., No. 19231.

• Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
• Writing for the Court: Becker
• Citation: 279 S.W. 195
• Decision Date: 05 January 1926
• Docket Number: No. 19231.
• Parties: KING, Collector of Revenue, v. RIVERLAND LEVEE DIST.

279 S.W. 195 KING, Collector of Revenue,
v.
RIVERLAND LEVEE DIST. No. 19231. St. Louis Court of Appeals. Missouri. January 5, 1926.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; Edgar B. Woolfolk, Judge.

Action by Tom M. King, Collector of Revenue of Pike County, against the Riverland Levee District. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.

J. W. Matson, of Louisiana, Mo., for appellant.

Ras Pearson, of Louisiana, Mo., for respondent.

BECKER, J.

This is a suit instituted by Tom M. King, collector of revenue of Pike county, Mo., to recover from the Riverland levee district, a corporation organized under article 9, c. 28, Revised Statutes of Missouri 1919, a commission of 2 per cent. on the sum turned over to defendant by the sheriff as the proceeds of sale on execution under a judgment obtained by said defendant upon delinquent levee tax bills. Plaintiff recovered below, and the defendant in due course appeals.

This case was tried and submitted upon the following agreed statement of facts:

"Agreed Statement of This Cause, Submitted under Section 1548 and Section 1549 of Article 17, Chapter 12, Revised Statutes 1919 of Missouri:

"Now, this day come the parties in the above-entitled cause, and agree to submit this cause to the circuit court of Pike county, Mo., for determination, and for the purpose of this submission only agree that the following are the facts upon which this cause is to be decided:

"Plaintiff was, on the 1st day of March, 1919, duly elected and qualified as the collector of revenue of Pike county, Mo., and continued to be said collector until the 1st day of March, 1923. That at all times during the said period, plaintiff, as said collector, performed all the duties required of him by law, in relation to the collection of taxes due or claimed to be due the defendant, and as said collector during said time was entitled to whatever commission the law provides shall be paid to the collector of the revenue of Pike county, Mo., upon taxes collected and paid to said defendant, or to any of the officers of said defendant for said defendant.

"That the defendant was, on or about the 2d day of September, 1914, in said circuit court, duly incorporated and organized under the law relative to the organization of levee districts by circuit courts of the state of Missouri, and has continued to, and is still existing, as such levee district corporated since that time. That the defendant and its officers and employés have performed all the duties and requirements of the law relating to such organizations.

"That certain taxes for the year 1921 due the defendant became delinquent, and defendant instituted suit in this court for said taxes against the Riverland Farms Company, a corporation, George E. Lynott, Bank of Louisiana, a corporation, Sam Sparrow, and Pike County Land Company, a corporation, and a judgment, a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof, was duly and regularly rendered by this court in favor of the defendant and against said defendants in said suit for said taxes. That afterwards an execution was issued on said judgment, as shown by a copy of said execution hereto attached, and made a part of this agreement, and a sale of the land described in said judgment and in said execution was duly and regularly had by virtue of said judgment and execution by the sheriff of Pike county, Mo., and from the proceeds of said sale the sum of $8,204.96 for the taxes and the interest then due thereon to the defendant under said judgment and said execution realized and paid to said sheriff the said amount of taxes and the interest thereon so collected was paid by said sheriff direct to the treasurer of this defendant, and by said treasurer paid to this defendant, and said amount so paid was not for any commission taxed as costs for the plaintiff.

"That plaintiff claims that he is entitled to a commission of 2 per cent. on said amount of said taxes and the interest thereon, totaling $164.09, so collected by said sheriff under and by virtue of said sale under said judgment and said execution, and so paid by said sheriff to said treasurer of the defendant and by said treasurer paid to the defendant, the same as though said amount of taxes and interest had been collected by the plaintiff before suit and by plaintiff paid to said treasurer of defendant and by treasurer paid defendant.

"The defendant herein denies that plaintiff is entitled to said commission, or any part of the same, on said taxes and the interest thereon so collected and paid as aforesaid, and that question

279 S.W. 196

on the facts herein agreed upon is hereby submitted to the court for its determination in this cause."

It is no longer open to question but that compensation to a public officer is a matter of statute and not of contract, and that compensation exists, if it exists at all, solely as the creation of the law and then is incidental to the office. State ex rel. Evans v. Gordon, 245 Mo. 12 loc. cit. 27, 149 S. W. 638; Sanderson v. Pike County, 195 Mo. 598, 93 S. W. 942; State ex rel. Troll v. Brown, 146 Mo. 401, 47 S. W. 504. Furthermore, our Supreme Court has cited with approval the statement of the general rule to be found in State ex rel. Wedeking v. McCracken, 60 Mo. App. loc. cit. 656, to the effect that the rendition of services by a public officer is to be deemed gratuitous unless a compensation therefor is provided by statute, and that if by statute compensation is provided for in a particular mode or manner, then the officer is confined to that manner and is entitled to no other or further compensation, or to any different mode of securing the same. State ex rel. Evans v. Gordon, supra.

What, then, do our statutes provide, if anything, upon the question in issue here? It is conceded that "practically all the law" governing the rights of the collector to commissions on delinquent levee taxes so far as the instant case is concerned, is set forth in article 9, c. 28, Revised Statutes of Missouri 1919.

Said chapter 28, which is devoted exclusively to "Drains and Levees," comprises 11 articles. Article 1 thereof, which deals with the organization of drainage districts by circuit courts, provides by section 4426 that delinquent drainage taxes shall be certified by the secretary of the board of supervisors to the county treasurer as ex officio collector of delinquent taxes, who shall collect such delinquent drainage taxes at the same time and in the same manner as is herein provided for the collection of delinquent drainage taxes in counties not under the provisions of chapter 121, Revised Statutes of Missouri 1919; and further provides that the lien of such taxes shall be enforced, and suits to collect such delinquent taxes shall be instituted by the drainage district on tax bills duly made out and certified by the county treasurer as ex officio collector of delinquent taxes.

Article 2 provides for the organization of entire counties into drainage districts by the county court, such...